The alignment of information systems with organizational objectives and strategies in health care
Abstract
Purpose The alignment of information systems with organizational objectives and strategies is a key, contemporary challenge to organizations in general and the health care industry in particular. Researchers and managers alike believe that the selection of new information systems to support objectives and strategies focuses the organization on accomplishing its objectives and realizing the value of the investments in the systems. The purpose of this study was to help understand alignment in health care so that health care information systems planners can better achieve it.Methods Structured interviews with 15 top information systems managers in health care organizations of various sizes and types inquired about organizational objectives and strategies, the process for choosing new information systems to support those objectives and strategies, and the concomitant facilitating and hindering managerial actions and organizational characteristics.Results In addition to identifying and elucidating specific objectives, strategies, processes for choosing new systems, and facilitating and hindering actions and characteristics, the study used the data to characterize a generalized process of alignment in health care organizations.Conclusions The study contributes by confirming that alignment is a significant issue in health care organizations, and that such organizations make deliberate efforts to achieve it. The study further contributes by providing tables of actions and characteristics that managers might use as checklists in current and future alignment efforts as well as in generally cultivating broad support for alignment. Finally, it contributes by suggesting future study of alignment's predictors and effects in health care organizations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bush et al. suggested five steps for aligning information systems with organizational objectives: 1) identify organization objectives; 2) identify organization strategy to cope with the objectives; 3) envision an information system to support organization strategies; 4) gain approval of health centres at a high-level to implement the system; 5) implement the system.
“Bush et. al. in [29] suggested five steps for aligning information systems with organizational objectives: 1) identify organization objectives; 2) identify organization strategy to cope with the objectives; 3) envision an information system to support organization strategies; 4) gain approval of health centres at a high-level to implement the system; 5) implement the system.”
From Lessons learned after a three-year store and forward teledermatology experience using internet: Strengths and limitations (2012) · cites this paper as [29]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 99
- Authors
- Bush, M., Lederer, A. L., Li, X., Palmisano, J., & Rao, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lederer, Albert L.
- ORCID
- Rao, Shashank
- Venue
- International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 446-456
- ISSN
- 1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134601795
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 13.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
- Keywords
- information systems alignment, organizational goals, organizational strategy, health information systems, information system selection, health care organization, IT managers, organizational characteristics
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Information Systems, Organizational Objectives, Primary Health Care, Quality Assurance, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review