Cited by 99Information Technology Governance and StrategyInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationInformation Systems Education and Curriculum Development

The alignment of information systems with organizational objectives and strategies in health care

Bush, Marianne, Lederer, Albert L., Li, Xun, Palmisano, Jay, Rao, Shashank·2009·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Purpose The alignment of information systems with organizational objectives and strategies is a key, contemporary challenge to organizations in general and the health care industry in particular. Researchers and managers alike believe that the selection of new information systems to support objectives and strategies focuses the organization on accomplishing its objectives and realizing the value of the investments in the systems. The purpose of this study was to help understand alignment in health care so that health care information systems planners can better achieve it.Methods Structured interviews with 15 top information systems managers in health care organizations of various sizes and types inquired about organizational objectives and strategies, the process for choosing new information systems to support those objectives and strategies, and the concomitant facilitating and hindering managerial actions and organizational characteristics.Results In addition to identifying and elucidating specific objectives, strategies, processes for choosing new systems, and facilitating and hindering actions and characteristics, the study used the data to characterize a generalized process of alignment in health care organizations.Conclusions The study contributes by confirming that alignment is a significant issue in health care organizations, and that such organizations make deliberate efforts to achieve it. The study further contributes by providing tables of actions and characteristics that managers might use as checklists in current and future alignment efforts as well as in generally cultivating broad support for alignment. Finally, it contributes by suggesting future study of alignment's predictors and effects in health care organizations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.02.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bush et al. suggested five steps for aligning information systems with organizational objectives: 1) identify organization objectives; 2) identify organization strategy to cope with the objectives; 3) envision an information system to support organization strategies; 4) gain approval of health centres at a high-level to implement the system; 5) implement the system.

    “Bush et. al. in [29] suggested five steps for aligning information systems with organizational objectives: 1) identify organization objectives; 2) identify organization strategy to cope with the objectives; 3) envision an information system to support organization strategies; 4) gain approval of health centres at a high-level to implement the system; 5) implement the system.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 99

Authors
Bush, M., Lederer, A. L., Li, X., Palmisano, J., & Rao, S.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Lederer, Albert L.
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
78
Issue
7
Pages
446-456
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134601795
Cited by
99
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
13.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
Keywords
information systems alignment, organizational goals, organizational strategy, health information systems, information system selection, health care organization, IT managers, organizational characteristics
MeSH terms
Humans, Information Systems, Organizational Objectives, Primary Health Care, Quality Assurance, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review