Cited by 5Electronic Health Records SystemsMachine Learning in HealthcareClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

The value of EHR-based assessment of physician competency: An investigative effort with internal medicine physicians

Open access
Venta, Kimberly, Baker, Erin, Fidopiastis, Cali, Stanney, Kay·2017·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of developing an EHR-based model of physician competency, named the Skill Deficiency Evaluation Toolkit for Eliminating Competency-loss Trends (Skill-DETECT), which presents the opportunity to use EHR-based models to inform selection of Continued Medical Education (CME) opportunities specifically targeted at maintaining proficiency. Methods The IBM Explorys platform provided outpatient Electronic Health Records (EHRs) representing 76 physicians with over 5000 patients combined. These data were used to develop the Skill-DETECT model, a predictive hybrid model composed of a rule-based model, logistic regression model, and a thresholding model, which predicts cognitive clinical skill deficiencies in internal medicine physicians. A three-phase approach was then used to statistically validate the model performance. Results Subject Matter Expert (SME) panel reviews resulted in a 100% overall approval rate of the rule based model. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves calculated for each logistic regression curve resulted in values between 0.76 and 0.92, which indicated exceptional performance. Normality, skewness, and kurtosis were determined and confirmed that the distribution of values output from the thresholding model were unimodal and peaked, which confirmed effectiveness and generalizability. Conclusions The validation has confirmed that the Skill-DETECT model has a strong ability to evalua…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.08.003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Venta, K., Baker, E., Fidopiastis, C., & Stanney, K.
Affiliations
Design Interactive (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Baker, Erin
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
108
Pages
169-174
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2747974813
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Army Medical Research & Materiel Command
  • Telemedicine & Advanced Technology Research Center (W81XWH-13-1-0311)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
electronic health records, internists, rule-based models, logistic regression, hybrid predictive model, model validation
MeSH terms
Workforce, Clinical Competence, Female, Humans, Internal Medicine, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Physicians, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review