Cited by 18Electronic Health Records SystemsHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsNursing Diagnosis and Documentation

Site readiness assessment preceding the implementation of a HIV care and treatment electronic medical record system in Kenya

Muthee, V., Bochner, A.F., Kang’a, S., Owiso, G., Akhwale, W., Wanyee, S., Puttkammer, N.·2018·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Introduction Electronic medical record (EMR) systems can yield many benefit; however, facilities need to meet certain requirements before they are able to successfully implement an EMR. We evaluated the feasibility and utility of conducting EMR readiness assessments (ERAs) to assess readiness of public facilities in Kenya for deployment of an EMR. Method I-TECH supported the Ministry of Health to deploy KenyaEMR, an HIV/AIDS care and treatment EMR developed using the OpenMRS platform, at over 300 healthcare facilities in Kenya. The ERA tool was designed to assess site readiness for KenyaEMR deployment. The assessments measured health facility internal environment in terms of available resources, security, technical infrastructure, and leadership buy-in and support from MOH and stakeholders for EMR implementation. Results From September 2012 to September 2014, a total of 381facilities received at least one ERA. Of these, 343facilities were rated as highly or moderately prepared to adopt an EMR system and proceeded to EMR deployment. 61% of these sites were set up to implement KenyaEMR at point of care, while 39% were set up to implement KenyaEMR for retrospective data entry. Across 38facilities not implemented with an EMR, common reasons that prevented the implementation were lack of reliable power, security issues such as lack of grills on the windows and un-lockable doors, and existence of another EMR system at the site. Conclusions ERAs conducted in a single day site visit were feasible and were instrumental in determining facilities' EMR implementation decision. Performing ERAs stimulated engagement of facility-level personnel to cultivate a fertile environment for EMR adoption and ownership. The assessments further assisted in resource mobilization, remediation of barriers to deployment, and increased buy-in from Ministry of Health leadership to support EMR implementation work.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.10.019

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muthee, V., Bochner, A. F., Kang’a, S., Owiso, G., Akhwale, W., Wanyee, S., & Puttkammer, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Kenya Health Informatics Association (KE)
Corresponding author
Muthee, V.
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
109
Pages
23-29
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2766408760
Cited by
18
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Keywords
electronic health records, HIV care and treatment, OpenMRS, health facility readiness, power reliability, facility security, leadership buy-in, Kenya
MeSH terms
Health Facilities, Health Plan Implementation, Humans, Kenya, Leadership, Retrospective Studies, HIV-1, HIV Infections, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review