Site readiness assessment preceding the implementation of a HIV care and treatment electronic medical record system in Kenya
Abstract
Introduction Electronic medical record (EMR) systems can yield many benefit; however, facilities need to meet certain requirements before they are able to successfully implement an EMR. We evaluated the feasibility and utility of conducting EMR readiness assessments (ERAs) to assess readiness of public facilities in Kenya for deployment of an EMR. Method I-TECH supported the Ministry of Health to deploy KenyaEMR, an HIV/AIDS care and treatment EMR developed using the OpenMRS platform, at over 300 healthcare facilities in Kenya. The ERA tool was designed to assess site readiness for KenyaEMR deployment. The assessments measured health facility internal environment in terms of available resources, security, technical infrastructure, and leadership buy-in and support from MOH and stakeholders for EMR implementation. Results From September 2012 to September 2014, a total of 381facilities received at least one ERA. Of these, 343facilities were rated as highly or moderately prepared to adopt an EMR system and proceeded to EMR deployment. 61% of these sites were set up to implement KenyaEMR at point of care, while 39% were set up to implement KenyaEMR for retrospective data entry. Across 38facilities not implemented with an EMR, common reasons that prevented the implementation were lack of reliable power, security issues such as lack of grills on the windows and un-lockable doors, and existence of another EMR system at the site. Conclusions ERAs conducted in a single day site visit were feasible and were instrumental in determining facilities' EMR implementation decision. Performing ERAs stimulated engagement of facility-level personnel to cultivate a fertile environment for EMR adoption and ownership. The assessments further assisted in resource mobilization, remediation of barriers to deployment, and increased buy-in from Ministry of Health leadership to support EMR implementation work.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The standalone EHR implementation model relies on a dependable electrical supply and readily available information technology personnel.
“The model relies on a dependable electrical supply and readily available information technology personnel [14].”
From mUzima Mobile Electronic Health Record (EHR) System: Development and Implementation at Scale (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
Cites
Costs and benefits of health information technology.
Shekelle, P. G., Morton, S. C., & Keeler, E. B. (2006) · doi:10.23970/ahrqepcerta132 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
Greenhalgh, T., Stramer, K., Bratan, T., Byrne, E., Russell, J., & Potts, H. W. W. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c3111 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Oluoch, T., Santas, X., Kwaro, D., Were, M., Biondich, P., Bailey, C., Abu-Hanna, A., & de Keizer, N. (2012) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.07.010 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The impact of routine data quality assessments on electronic medical record data quality in Kenya
Muthee, V., Bochner, A. F., Osterman, A., Liku, N., Akhwale, W., Kwach, J., Prachi, M., Wamicwe, J., Odhiambo, J., Onyango, F., et al. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195362 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationmUzima Mobile Electronic Health Record (EHR) System: Development and Implementation at Scale
Were, M. C., Savai, S., Mokaya, B., Mbugua, S., Ribeka, N., Cholli, P., & Yeung, A. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/26381 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“The model relies on a dependable electrical supply and readily available information technology personnel [14].”
Method
- Authors
- Muthee, V., Bochner, A. F., Kang’a, S., Owiso, G., Akhwale, W., Wanyee, S., & Puttkammer, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Kenya Health Informatics Association (KE)
- Corresponding author
- Muthee, V.
- Venue
- International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 109
- Pages
- 23-29
- ISSN
- 1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2766408760
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
- Keywords
- electronic health records, HIV care and treatment, OpenMRS, health facility readiness, power reliability, facility security, leadership buy-in, Kenya
- MeSH terms
- Health Facilities, Health Plan Implementation, Humans, Kenya, Leadership, Retrospective Studies, HIV-1, HIV Infections, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review