Cited by 121Electronic Health Records SystemsHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

The effect of electronic medical record-based clinical decision support on HIV care in resource-constrained settings: A systematic review

Oluoch, Tom, Santas, Xenophon, Kwaro, Daniel, Were, Martin, Biondich, Paul, Bailey, Christopher, Abu-Hanna, Ameen, de Keizer, Nicolette·2012·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Background It is estimated that one million people infected with HIV initiate anti-retroviral therapy (ART) in resource-constrained countries annually. This occurs against a background of overburdened health workers with limited skills to handle rapidly changing treatment standards and guidelines hence compromising quality of care. Electronic medical record (EMR)-based clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are considered a solution to improve quality of care. Little evidence, however, exists on the effectiveness of EMR-based CDSS on quality of HIV care and treatment in resource-constrained settings.Objective The aim of this systematic review was to identify original studies on EMR-based CDSS describing process and outcome measures as well as reported barriers to their implementation in resource-constrained settings. We characterized the studies by guideline adherence, data and process, and barriers to CDSS implementation.Methods Two reviewers independently assessed original articles from a search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Global Health Library databases until January 2012. The included articles were those that evaluated or described the implementation of EMR-based CDSS that were used in HIV care in low-income countries.Results A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria, 10 of which were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa and 2 in the Caribbean. None of the papers described a strong (randomized controlled) evaluation design. Guideline adherence: One study showed that ordering rates for CD4 tests were significantly higher when reminders were used. Data and process: Studies reported reduction in data errors, reduction in missed appointments, reduction in missed CD4 results and reduction in patient waiting time. Two studies showed a significant increase in time spent by clinicians on direct patient care. Barriers to CDSS implementation: Technical infrastructure problems such as unreliable electric power and erratic Internet connectivity, clinicians' limited computer skills and failure by providers to comply with the reminders are key impediments to the implementation and effective use of CDSS.Conclusion The limited number of evaluation studies, the basic and heterogeneous study designs, and varied outcome measures make it difficult to meaningfully conclude on the effectiveness of CDSS on quality of HIV care and treatment in resource-limited settings. High quality evaluation studies are needed. Factors specific to implementation of EMR-based CDSS in resource-limited setting should be addressed before such countries can demonstrate its full benefits. More work needs to be done to overcome the barriers to EMR and CDSS implementation in developing countries such as technical infrastructure and care providers' computer illiteracy. However, simultaneously evaluating and describing CDSS implementation strategies that work can further guide wise investments in their wider rollout.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.07.010

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Infrastructure features important for implementation include electricity supply, available bandwidth, reliable internet connectivity, access to computers, electrical power, and access to phone lines and mobile phones.

    “Infrastructure features included electricity supply [51], available bandwidth [31, 51], access to reliable internet connectivity [45, 51], access to computers [34], electrical power [45] and access to phone lines and mobile phones [45].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oluoch, T., Santas, X., Kwaro, D., Were, M., Biondich, P., Bailey, C., Abu-Hanna, A., & de Keizer, N.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Kenya Medical Research Institute (KE)
  • Regenstrief Institute (US)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
Corresponding author
Oluoch, Tom
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
81
Issue
10
Pages
e83-e92
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053961376
Cited by
120
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
electronic health records, clinical decision support systems, HIV care, antiretroviral therapy, resource-limited settings, low-income countries, guideline adherence, implementation barriers, technological infrastructure, computer literacy, quality of care, sub-Saharan Africa, Caribbean, missed appointments, data errors, patient waiting time, clinician workload, health information technology evaluation
MeSH terms
Humans, Health Care Rationing, HIV Infections, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Decision Support Systems, Clinical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review