Cited by 61Machine Learning in HealthcareEmergency and Acute Care StudiesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Prediction of emergency department revisits using area-level social determinants of health measures and health information exchange information

Vest, Joshua R, Ben-Assuli, Ofir·2019·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Introduction Interoperable health information technologies, like electronic health records (EHR) and health information exchange (HIE), provide greater access to patient information from across multiple organizations. Also, an increasing number of public data sources exist to describe social determinant of health factors. These data may help better inform risk prediction models, but the relative importance or value of these data has not been established. This study assessed the performance of different classes of information individually, and in combination, in predicting emergency department (ED) revisits. Methods In a sample of 279,611 adult ED encounters. We compared the performance of Two-Class Boosted Decision Trees machine learning algorithm using 5 classes of information: 1) social determinants of health measures only, 2) current visit EHR information only, 3) current and historical EHR information, 4) HIE information only, and 5) all available information combined. Results The social determinants of health measure only model had the overall worst performance with an area under the curve AUC of 0.61. The model using all information classes together had the best performance (AUC = 0.732). The model using HIE information only performed better than all other single information class models. Conclusions Broad information sources, which are reflective of patients' reliance on multiple organizations for care, better support risk prediction modeling in the emergency departmen…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.06.013

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vest, J. R., & Ben-Assuli, O.
Affiliations
Regenstrief Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Vest, Joshua R
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
129
Pages
205-210
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2949837546
Cited by
61
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (73485)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
emergency department revisits, social determinants of health, health information exchange, electronic health records, risk prediction model, interoperability, boosted decision trees, hospital readmission
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Electronic Health Records, Social Determinants of Health, Health Information Exchange

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review