Cited by 75Technology Use by Older AdultsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

The effectiveness of smart home technologies to support the health outcomes of community-dwelling older adults living with dementia: A scoping review

Open access
Moyle, Wendy, Murfield, Jenny, Lion, Katarzyna·2021·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Objectives To map the current state-of-knowledge about the effectiveness of smart home technologies to support the health outcomes of community-dwelling older adults living with dementia. Design A scoping review following the methodological frameworks described by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and Levac et al. (2010). Data sources Electronic databases and online sources were searched in April 2020 using database specific medical subject headings and keywords about 'smart homes' and 'dementia'. Methods Empirical peer-reviewed articles were included if they were written in English; used a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed method design; and presented the effects of a smart home technology on the health outcomes of community-dwelling adults living with dementia. Methodological and reporting quality of studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool - Version 2018. Results Five studies described evaluations of five smart home technology systems with a total of n = 617 community-dwelling people living with dementia. Collectively, studies showed potential effectiveness of the technologies on a range of health outcomes (physical activity, activities of daily living, sleep, anxiety, depression, agitation, irritability, risk of falls, cognitive functioning, night-time injury, unattended home exits). However, the overall methodological and reporting quality of studies was low and profiled a research field lacking in rigorous evaluation. Conclusions Based on current evidence,…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104513

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A scoping review indicated that smart-home technologies are not ready for implementation for people with dementia, and that there was not clear evidence of efficacy.

    “A scoping review indicated that smart-home technologies, which are appliances and devices in the home connected via the internet to enhance the living environment, are not ready for implementation for people with dementia, and that there was not clear evidence of efficacy .(560)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moyle, W., Murfield, J., & Lion, K.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
153
Pages
104513
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3172563701
Cited by
75
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
smart home technology, dementia, community-dwelling older adults, health outcomes, activities of daily living, physical activity, sleep, depression, anxiety, agitation, falls, cognitive function, community-based dementia care
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Dementia, Humans, Technology, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review