What Physical Examinations Are Observed during an In-Person GP Consultation? Automatic Extraction Using a Text-Based Approach
Open accessAbstract
Objectives Teleconsultation is anticipated to have a long-term role in primary care. However, conducting virtual physical examinations is a well-known limitation. To anticipate unmet needs general practitioners (GPs) and patients may experience during teleconsultation, this study aims to automatically identify physical examinations typically conducted during in-person GP consultation. Material and methods This study utilizes 281 GP in-person consultations (de-identified transcripts & video recordings) within UK general practices, where 169 eligible ones were included in this study. We propose an automated text-based approach using regular expressions on keywords in GP-patient consultation dialogue (e.g., "roll up your sleeves") to identify physical examinations (e.g. blood pressure measurement). This approach involves the construction of conceptual diagrams to visually inspect the relationship between keywords and physical examinations, syntax analysis to identify patterns between keywords and generate regular expressions, and the use of these regular expressions in consultation transcripts to detect potential instances of physical examinations, where matching video frames were subsequently retrieved. The performance of our automated text-based approach is compared to manual classification by 2 independent researchers using 5-fold cross-validation (precision, recall, and F1-score). Results Among the 169 eligible GP in-person consultations, 133 (79%) required a physical examin…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The physical examination is critical in supporting diagnoses and is required in nearly 80% of in-person general practitioner (GP) consultations.
“The physical examination is critical in supporting diagnoses and is required in nearly 80% of in-person general practitioner (GP) consultations [240].”
From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [240]
Cites
Davoodi, N. M., Chen, K., Zou, M., Li, M., Jiménez, F., Wetle, T. F., & Goldberg, E. M. (2021) · JACEP Open · doi:10.1002/emp2.12577 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors
Yen, C., Epling, J. W., Rockwell, M., & Vaughn-Cooke, M. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16020347 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Waheed, M., Xiong, H., Tong, K., & Lau, A. Y.
- Affiliations
- Macquarie University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Waheed, Moomna
- Venue
- International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-12
- Volume
- 192
- Pages
- 105632
- ISSN
- 1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4402566248
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
- Keywords
- physical examination, general practitioner visits, teleconsultation, regular expressions, vital signs, blood pressure measurement, primary care
- MeSH terms
- United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Physical Examination, Remote Consultation, General Practitioners, General Practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review