Cited by 22Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationTechnology Use by Older AdultsHealthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic

Emergency Physician Perspectives on Using Telehealth with Older Adults during COVID-19: A Qualitative Study

Open access
Davoodi, Natalie M., Chen, Kevin, Zou, Maria, Li, Melinda, Jiménez, Frances, Wetle, Terrie Fox, Goldberg, Elizabeth M.·2021·JACEP Open

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Emergency medicine physicians have played a pivotal role throughout the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic through in-person and remote management and treatment. Our primary objectives were to understand emergency medicine physicians' experiences using telehealth throughout the pandemic, any facilitators/barriers to successful usage, lessons learned during implementation, and successful/abandoned strategies used to engage with older adults. METHODS: Using a semi-structured interview guide, we conducted 30-min interviews. We used purposeful sampling to recruit emergency medicine physicians from all United States regions, rural-urban settings, and academic and community practices, who reported caring for patients 65 years or older in-person or virtually during the pandemic. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, double-coded, and analyzed for emergent themes using framework analysis. RESULTS: A total of 15 in-depth interviews were completed from September to November 2020. Physicians had a median age of 37 years, 7 were women, and 9 had experience with telehealth before the pandemic. We identified several themes: (1) there were various motivations for telehealth use; (2) telehealth was used primarily to supplement, not replace in-person care; (3) most platforms were easy to use; (4) patients and caregivers had high acceptability of telemedicine; and (5) older adults with sensory and cognitive impairments often relied on caregivers. Emergency medicine physicians played a critical role during primary care office closures during the first wave-dispelling misinformation about COVID-19, triaging patients to testing and treatment, and providing care that would otherwise have been deferred. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that telemedicine gained acceptability among emergency medicine physicians and provided options to patients who may have otherwise deferred care. These findings can inform future healthcare delivery for acute care needs or pandemic responses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/emp2.12577

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lack of remote physical exams, like abdominal assessments and vital checks, can create significant challenges in telemedicine, as essential clinical signals can be missed in video or phone consultations.

    “The lack of remote physical exams, like abdominal assessments and vital checks, can create significant challenges in telemedicine, as essential clinical signals can be missed in video or phone consultations [241].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [5]What is telehealth? NEJM Catalyst website. Updated February 1, 2018. Accessed March 17, 2021 https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.18.0268 · DOI
  2. [34]Ward DJ, Furber C, Tierney S, Swallow V. Using Framework Analysis in nursing research: a worked example. J Adv Nurs. 2013; 69(11): 2423‐ 2431. 23517523
  3. [45]Nesbitt TS. The evolution of telehealth: where have we been and where are we going? In: The Role of Telehealth in an Evolving Health Care Environment: Workshop Summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2012. 24901186

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davoodi, N. M., Chen, K., Zou, M., Li, M., Jiménez, F., Wetle, T. F., & Goldberg, E. M.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Goldberg, Elizabeth M.
Venue
JACEP Open
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
2
Issue
5
Pages
e12577
ISSN
2688-1152 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3206876620
Cited by
22
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (K76AG059983)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic
Keywords
telemedicine, emergency physicians, older adults, COVID-19 pandemic, physician attitudes, barriers and facilitators, caregiver involvement, patient acceptability, delayed care, triage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review