The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibacterial activity of silver and zinc nanoparticles against Vibrio cholerae and enterotoxic Escherichia coli
Open accessAbstract
Vibrio cholerae and enterotoxic Escherichia coli (ETEC) remain two dominant bacterial causes of severe secretory diarrhea and still a significant cause of death, especially in developing countries. In order to investigate new effective and inexpensive therapeutic approaches, we analyzed nanoparticles synthesized by a green approach using corresponding salt (silver or zinc nitrate) with aqueous extract of Caltropis procera fruit or leaves. We characterized the quantity and quality of nanoparticles by UV-visible wavelength scans and nanoparticle tracking analysis. Nanoparticles could be synthesized in reproducible yields of approximately 10(8) particles/ml with mode particles sizes of approx. 90-100 nm. Antibacterial activity against two pathogens was assessed by minimal inhibitory concentration assays and survival curves. Both pathogens exhibited similar resistance profiles with minimal inhibitory concentrations ranging between 5×10(5) and 10(7) particles/ml. Interestingly, zinc nanoparticles showed a slightly higher efficacy, but sublethal concentrations caused adverse effects and resulted in increased biofilm formation of V. cholerae. Using the expression levels of the outer membrane porin OmpT as an indicator for cAMP levels, our results suggest that zinc nanoparticles inhibit adenylyl cyclase activity. This consequently deceases the levels of this second messenger, which is a known inhibitor of biofilm formation. Finally, we demonstrated that a single oral administration of silver nanoparticles to infant mice colonized with V. cholerae or ETEC significantly reduces the colonization rates of the pathogens by 75- or 100-fold, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Haes, A. J., & Van Duyne, R. P. (2002) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja020393x · Cited by 2,057
Cited by
The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: present situation and prospects for the future
Wang, L., Hu, C., & Shao, L. (2017) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s121956 · Cited by 4,062
The Advancing of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications
Jiang, J., Pi, J., & Cai, J. (2018) · Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications · doi:10.1155/2018/1062562 · Cited by 1,255
Nayak, D., Ashe, S., Rauta, P. R., Kumari, M., & Nayak, B. (2016) · Materials Science and Engineering: C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2015.08.022 · Cited by 332
Zou, Y.-H., Wang, J., Cui, L.-Y., Zeng, R.-C., Wang, Q.-Z., Han, Q.-X., Qiu, J., Chen, X.-B., Chen, D.-C., Guan, S.-K., et al. (2019) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.069 · Cited by 173
Dadkan, S., Khakbiz, M., Ghazanfari, L., Chen, M., & Lee, K.-B. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2022.119824 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Salem, W., Leitner, D. R., Zingl, F. G., Schratter, G., Prassl, R., Goessler, W., Reidl, J., & Schild, S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Medical Microbiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 305
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-95
- ISSN
- 1438-4221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043758394
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibacterial activity of silver and zinc nanoparticles against Vibrio cholerae and enterotoxic Escherichia coli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.11.005
- The paper
- Salem, W., Leitner, D. R., Zingl, F. G., Schratter, G., Prassl, R., Goessler, W., Reidl, J., & Schild, S. (2015). Antibacterial activity of silver and zinc nanoparticles against Vibrio cholerae and enterotoxic Escherichia coli. International Journal of Medical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.11.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.