CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 26

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Simulation study of coal mine safety investment based on system dynamics

Tong, Lei, Dou, Yuanyuan·2014·International Journal of Mining Science and Technology
DOI 10.1016/j.ijmst.2014.01.010
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmst.2014.01.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cost-benefit analysis for high-risk industries of value adding to workers' safety knowledge, behaviour change and risk perceptions is crucial to risk mitigation and often mandatory.

    “The cost-benefit analysis for these industries of ‘value adding’ to workers (especially inexperienced) safety knowledge, behaviour change and risk perceptions is crucial to risk mitigation and often mandatory [135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142].”

    From What People Really Think About Safety around Horses: The Relationship between Risk Perception, Values and Safety Behaviours (2020) · cites this paper as [138]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Li, 2013, A model of unsafe behavior in coal mines based on game theory, Int J Mining Sci Technol, 23, 99, 10.1016/j.ijmst.2013.01.015 · DOI
  2. Li, 2013, Investment in coal mine production safety and economic benefits of relationship, Coal Technol, 32, 235
  3. Bao, 2008, Coal mine safety input and safety performance of Shendong Coal Branch, Shannaxi Coal, 04, 81
  4. Shen, 2007, China coal mine analysis of safety input and safety performance, Opencast Mining Technol, 6, 65
  5. Lind, 2002, Social and economic criteria of acceptable risk, Reliab Eng Syst Safety, 78, 21, 10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00051-0 · DOI
  6. Peter J.M. Sonnemans, Patrick M. Korvers, Aarnout C. Brombacher. How safety-investments increase performance: a practical case. In: Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintain-Ability Symposium, Seattle WA, 2002:120–126.
  7. Farrow, 2003, Investing in safety an analytical precautionary principle, J Safety Res, 33, 165, 10.1016/S0022-4375(02)00023-3 · DOI
  8. Riel, 1997, The economic evaluation of ergonomic for preventive purpose: a case study, Int J Safety Res, 28, 159, 10.1016/S0022-4375(97)80005-9 · DOI
  9. Esterhuizen, 2006, Coal mine safety achievements in the USA and the contribution of NIOSH research, J Southern Am Inst Mining Metall, 32, 813
  10. Pasman, 2000, Risk informed resource allocation police: safe can save costs, J Hazard Mater, 71, 375, 10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00088-6 · DOI
  11. Son, 2000, An analysis of safety control effectiveness, Reliab Eng Safety, 68, 187, 10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00010-7 · DOI
  12. Tait, 2002, Marketing health and safety management expertise to small enterprises, Safety Sci, 36, 95, 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00033-3 · DOI
  13. Schlatter, 2007, Protecting your investment, J Mines Metals Fuels, 55, 507
  14. Wang, 2008, Structure analysis about safety input in coal mine, Chin Mining Mag, 17, 17
  15. Tong, 2008, Efficiency assessment of coal mine safety input by data envelopment analysis, J Chin Univ Mining Technol, 18, 88, 10.1016/S1006-1266(08)60019-X · DOI
  16. Liang, 2012, Safety investment efficiency evaluation based on DEA model and its application in coal mine, Chin Safety Sci J, 22, 16
  17. Li, 2009, Study on construction method of evaluation index system for safety input of coal mine, J Saf Sci Technol, 5, 93
  18. Li, 2009, Application of analytic hierarchy process in coal mine safety input, Safety Coal Mines, 23
  19. Xu, 2010, Fuzzy comprehensive assessment of mine safety input, Shannaxi Coal, 3, 54
  20. Wang, 2011, Research on relationship between coal mine safety input and safety performance based on system dynamics, J Liaoning Tech Univ, 30, 182
  21. Li, 2003, The SD model and analysis of coal mine safety management system, Mining Safety Environ Prot, 30, 21
  22. Lin, 2008, Analysis of system dynamics model of China’s coal mine safety situation, Mining Safety Environ Prot, 35, 83
  23. He, 2008, A system dynamics (SD) simulation analysis on the influencing factors of human behavior in coal mine work safety, Chin Safety Sci J, 18, 43
  24. He, 2010, Study on simulation of safety management level in coal mine based on system dynamics, J Syst Simulat, 22, 2013
  25. Liu, 2010, Systematic dynamics simulation and analysis of safety management in coal mine, China Safety Science Journal, 20, 45
  26. Tian, 2011, Research on three classes of hazards system of gas explosion based on SD, J Xi’an Univ Sci Technol, 31, 689

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tong, L., & Dou, Y.
Venue
International Journal of Mining Science and Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
201-205
ISSN
2095-2686
DOI
10.1016/j.ijmst.2014.01.010
Cited by
26
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review