Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanical behavior of coal under different mining rates: A case study from laboratory experiments to field testing

Open access
Gao, Mingzhong, Xie, Jing, Gao, Yanan, Wang, Wenyong, Li, Cong, Yang, Bengao, Liu, Junjun, Xie, Heping·2021·International Journal of Mining Science and Technology

Abstract

During deep mining, the excavation disturbance stress path is the domination factor for the stability of the surrounding rock mass as well as the ground pressure. One of the important parameters of the stress path is the loading or unloading rate of the disturbed rock or coal, which depended on the mining rate. To achieve a well understanding of the mining rate and its effect on the coal behavior, a preliminary case investigation of the mechanical properties of the coal at the various mining rates in both the laboratory scale and field scale was performed. Based on the uniaxial compression test and the digital image correlation (DIC) method, the mechanical behavior of the coal samples, such as the evolution of the strength, surface deformation, crack propagation, and elastic strain energy of the coal under the various loading rates were analyzed. A threshold range of the loading rate has been observed. The uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and releasable elastic strain energy (Ue) increase with increasing loading rate when the loading rate is below the threshold. Otherwise, the UCS and Ue may decrease with the loading rate. Under the low loading rate (≤0.05 mm/min), the tensile deformation of the original defects could result in crack coalescence, whereas failure of the coal matrix is the key contributor to the crack coalescence under the high loading rate (greater than0.05 mm/min). Afterwards, with the consideration of the bearing capacity (UCS) and energy release of the mining-disturbed coal mass (Ue), a power exponential relationship between the mining rate (MR) in the field and the critical loading rate (vc) in the laboratory was proposed. The application potential of the formulas was then validated against the field monitored data. Finally, based on the critical loading rate, the released strain energy, and the monitored pressure on the roof supports, a reasonable mining rate MR for the Ji15-31030 working face was determined to be approximately 3 m/d.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmst.2021.06.007

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Metadata

Authors
Gao, M., Xie, J., Gao, Y., Wang, W., Li, C., Yang, B., Liu, J., & Xie, H.
Venue
International Journal of Mining Science and Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
825-841
ISSN
2095-2686 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3185335119
Cited by
280
References
7
FWCI
26.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanical behavior of coal under different mining rates: A case study from laboratory experiments to field testing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijmst.2021.06.007
The paper
Gao, M., Xie, J., Gao, Y., Wang, W., Li, C., Yang, B., Liu, J., & Xie, H. (2021). Mechanical behavior of coal under different mining rates: A case study from laboratory experiments to field testing. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2021.06.007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.