The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From Husserl to van Manen. A review of different phenomenological approaches
Open accessAbstract
This paper traces the development of phenomenology as a philosophy originating from the writings of Husserl to its use in phenomenological research and theory development in nursing. The key issues of phenomenological reduction and bracketing are also discussed as they play a pivotal role in the how phenomenological research studies are approached. What has become to be known as "new" phenomenology is also explored and the key differences between it and "traditional" phenomenology are discussed. van Manen's phenomenology is also considered in light of its contemporary popularity among nurse researchers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
Phenomenological research methods
Moustakas, C. (1994) · doi:10.4135/9781412995658 · Cited by 13,919
Phenomenological Research Methods
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1989) · Existential-Phenomenological Perspectives in Psychology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-6989-3_3 · Cited by 1,800
Cited by
Qualitative thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology
Sundler, A. J., Lindberg, E., Nilsson, C., & Palmér, L. (2019) · Nursing Open · doi:10.1002/nop2.275 · Cited by 1,085
The phenomenological focus group: an oxymoron?
Bradbury‐Jones, C., Sambrook, S., & Irvine, F. (2009) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04922.x · Cited by 334
Burns, M., Bally, J., Burles, M., Holtslander, L., & Peacock, S. (2022) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069221077758 · Cited by 174
“Upon completion of a descriptive phenomenological study, an acontextual description of the phenomenon of interest is produced, untouched by researcher bias (Dowling, 2007).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHermeneutic phenomenological analysis: the ‘possibility’ beyond ‘actuality’ in thematic analysis
Ho, K. H. M., Chiang, V. C. L., & Leung, D. (2017) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.13255 · Cited by 140
Urcia, I. A. (2021) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069211045474 · Cited by 120
“For both GT and PA, adhering to the adaptations with post-positivist assumptions with the inherent objectivism is problematic and challenging to some researchers.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Dowling, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Nursing Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 131-142
- ISSN
- 0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006286197
- Cited by
- 1,061
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From Husserl to van Manen. A review of different phenomenological approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.026
- The paper
- Dowling, M. (2007). From Husserl to van Manen. A review of different phenomenological approaches. International Journal of Nursing Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
