The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critique on the conceptualisation of quality of life: A review and evaluation of different conceptual approaches
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires
McDowell, I., & Newell, C. (1987) · Cited by 4,207
Assessment of Quality-of-Life Outcomes
Testa, M. A., & Simonson, D. C. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199603283341306 · Cited by 2,551
Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model
Sprangers, M. A. G., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00045-3 · Cited by 2,228 · cited 1×
“In this context, the ‘‘Response Shift Model’’ was formulated in an attempt to explain how quality of life changes as a function of health state alterations (Sprangers and Schwartz, 1999).”
BackgroundA Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Quality-of-Life Measurements
Gill, T. M. (1994) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03520080061045 · Cited by 2,208
The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds
Albrecht, G. L., & Devlieger, P. J. (1999) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00411-0 · Cited by 2,064
Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires
Anderson, J. (1997) · The Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199711000-00018 · Cited by 1,527
Quality of life in cancer patients--an hypothesis.
Calman, K. C. (1984) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme.10.3.124 · Cited by 1,138
The Nottingham health profile: Subjective health status and medical consultations
Hunt, S. M., McKenna, S. P., McEwen, J., Williams, J., & Papp, E. (1981) · Social Science & Medicine. Part A: Medical Psychology & Medical Sociology · doi:10.1016/0271-7123(81)90005-5 · Cited by 1,093
Cited by
The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760701756946 · Cited by 2,396
Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Quality of Life: What is the Difference?
Karimi, M., & Brazier, J. (2016) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-016-0389-9 · Cited by 1,646
A systematic review of quality of life research in medicine and health sciences
the LIVSFORSK network, Haraldstad, K., Wahl, A., Andenæs, R., Andersen, J. R., Andersen, M. H., Beisland, E., Borge, C. R., Engebretsen, E., Eisemann, M., et al. (2019) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-019-02214-9 · Cited by 1,011
Self-citationKolotkin, R. L., & Andersen, J. R. (2017) · Clinical Obesity · doi:10.1111/cob.12203 · Cited by 590
Insomnia and health-related quality of life
Kyle, S. D., Morgan, K., & Espie, C. A. (2010) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2009.07.004 · Cited by 520
Metadata
- Authors
- Moons, P., Budts, W., & De Geest, S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Nursing Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 891-901
- ISSN
- 0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060624955
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 34.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critique on the conceptualisation of quality of life: A review and evaluation of different conceptual approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.03.015
- The paper
- Moons, P., Budts, W., & De Geest, S. (2006). Critique on the conceptualisation of quality of life: A review and evaluation of different conceptual approaches. International Journal of Nursing Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.03.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
