Cited by 1,646Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHealth Education and ValidationMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Quality of Life: What is the Difference?

Karimi, Milad, Brazier, John·2016·PharmacoEconomics

Abstract

The terms health, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and quality of life (QoL) are used interchangeably. Given that these are three key terms in the literature, their appropriate and clear use is important. This paper reviews the history and definitions of the terms and considers how they have been used. It is argued that the definitions of HRQoL in the literature are problematic because some definitions fail to distinguish between HRQoL and health or between HRQoL and QoL. Many so-called HRQoL questionnaires actually measure self-perceived health status and the use of the phrase QoL is unjustified. It is concluded that the concept of HRQoL as used now is confusing. A potential solution is to define HRQoL as the way health is empirically estimated to affect QoL or use the term to only signify the utility associated with a health state.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40273-016-0389-9

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In categorising the measures it became clear that there is inconsistency in the definitions and use of terms such as health status, quality of life and well-being, as previously reported.

    “In categorising the measures it became clear that there is inconsistency in the definitions and use of terms such as health status, quality of life and well-being, as previously reported. 211”

    From A scoping review to identify process and outcome measures used in acceptance and commitment therapy research, with adults with acquired neurological conditions. (2023) · cites this paper as [211]

    The Introduction (p. 3) says that measures are variously called health status, HRQoL, or QoL measures and that their definitions lack agreement. Section 3.2 (p. 4) discusses differing approaches to well-being, but the paper does not establish the same inconsistency in the use of ‘well-being’ as a term for measures. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [23]23. Bowling A. Measuring health. Third. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2005.
  2. [30]30. Bowling a NNI, Brazier J. 'Quality of Life' in Social Science and Medicine. 1995;41:1337-8.
  3. [45]45. Guyatt G, Feeny D, Patrick D. Postscript. Controlled Clinical Trials. 1991;12:266S 269S.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karimi, M., & Brazier, J.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Karimi, Milad
Venue
PharmacoEconomics
Published
2016-02-18
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
645-649
ISSN
  • 1170-7690 (ISSN-L)
  • 1179-2027
OpenAlex
W2279074305
Cited by
1,646
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 142 · 2025: 232 · 2024: 252 · 2023: 237 · 2022: 217 · 2021: 224 · 2020: 169 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
110.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PharmacoEconomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
NIHR CLAHRC YH
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
health-related quality of life, quality of life, health, conceptual definitions, terminology, health perception, health utility
MeSH terms
Health Status, Humans, Terminology as Topic, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review