Cited by 172Child Abuse and Related TraumaChild Abuse and TraumaMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

Factors influencing child abuse and neglect recognition and reporting by nurses: A multivariate analysis

Open access
Fraser, Jennifer A., Mathews, Ben, Walsh, Kerryann, Chen, Linping, Dunne, Michael·2010·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Background Reporting of known and suspected child abuse and neglect is a fundamental responsibility of health professionals in many countries including Australia. Nurses' duties to report child abuse and neglect are expressed in legislation, or in occupational policy documents. In this paper factors influencing nurses' compliance with mandated reporting are examined.Objective The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between nurse characteristics, training, knowledge of legislative reporting duty and attitudinal factors on the reporting by nurses of different types of child abuse and neglect.Methods Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine relationships between variables.Design, setting and participants A cross-sectional survey using the Child Abuse and Neglect Nurses' Questionnaire (CANNQ) was conducted. The respondents were 930 Registered Nurses (RNs) currently working across metropolitan, rural and remote locations throughout the state of Queensland, Australia.Results Nurses were confident and knowledgeable in their obligation to report physical [CPA] and sexual [CSA] abuse. They were less confident and knowledgeable about emotional abuse [CEA] and neglect [CN]. Recognition of the extent of harm to abused and neglected children was poor. Positive attitudes to mandatory reporting influenced better recognition of all forms of abuse and neglect and the likelihood of reporting CSA, CEA and CN; parenting experience influenced intention to report child sexual abuse, and CAN training predicted reporting of child neglect.Conclusions and practice implications Results indicate that with training, nurses are a key choice for mandating child abuse and neglect reporting. Educational preparation and training for nurses should emphasise the serious impact of child abuse and neglect on children and families to improve recognition of the extent of harm and the likelihood of reporting. From a perspective of increasing compliance with the legislative duty, particular attention needs to be paid to recognition and reporting of CEA and CN. Further research is needed to determine whether factors influencing sound reporting can be successfully modified.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.05.015

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Training on child abuse of all types increases identification and reporting by pediatricians, nurses, and teachers.

    “Our findings align with studies suggesting that training on child abuse of all types increases identification and reporting by pediatricians, nurses, and teachers (Ferrara et al., 2017; Fraser et al., 2010; Walsh et al., 2012).”

    From Child abuse prevention education policies increase reports of child sexual abuse (2022) · cites this paper as Fraser et al., 2010

    Section 3.4 (page not provided) reports that nurses with child-protection training were more likely to have reported suspected cases. The Discussion (page not provided) links training specifically to nurses’ likelihood of reporting child neglect, but says recent training did not affect their perceptions of the seriousness of abuse and neglect. This paper does not establish increased identification and reporting of all abuse types across pediatricians, nurses, and teachers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Daro, D. (Ed.), 2007. World Perspectives on Child Abuse. 7th ed. International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect, Chicago.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fraser, J. A., Mathews, B., Walsh, K., Chen, L., & Dunne, M.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Fraser, Jennifer A.
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
146-153
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972810233
Cited by
171
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child Abuse and Related Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
child abuse, mandatory reporting, nurses, reporting compliance, child sexual abuse, child physical abuse, childhood emotional abuse, child neglect, nurse training, parental experiences, Queensland
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Australia, Child, Child Abuse, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Nurses, Surveys and Questionnaires, Multivariate Analysis, Mandatory Reporting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review