Depression and protective factors of mental health in people with hepatitis C: A questionnaire survey
Abstract
Background Most studies investigating the effects of chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infection on the central nervous system have focused on cognitive impairment or on the health-related quality of life, but only few on depression.Objectives This study investigated depression in HCV-infected people. Sense of coherence and social support were surveyed as protective factors of mental health.Methods In a cross-sectional study-design, 81 HCV-infected people with mild liver disease, who were not receiving antiviral therapy, were surveyed by validated measures. Anxiety (HADS), depression (BDI), psychopathological symptoms (SCL-90-R), social support (F-SozU) and resilience (SOC) were assessed.Results Higher levels of depression than normal controls (p=.001) and a wide range of psychological symptoms were associated with HCV infection. Women, single participants, and persons with a shorter interval after first diagnosis exhibited significantly higher scores of depression. Gender and sense of coherence predicted depression scores in HCV people (R(2)=.42, p<.001).Conclusions The expression of depression in HCV-infected people is modulated not only by biological but also by psychological factors of mental health. Sense of coherence as a protective factor has a significant impact on the degree of depression. Furthermore, the high prevalence of depression and anxiety among persons not receiving antiviral therapy justifies psychosocial screening and support for HCV people independent of antiviral therapy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two population-based studies in the United States and Germany reported the prevalence of depression as 29.7% and 25.9%, respectively, though neither survey investigation measured anxiety.
“Two population-based studies in the United States [18] and Germany [20] reported the prevalence of DEP as 29.7% and 25.9%, respectively, though neither survey investigation measured ANX.”
From Prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms by liver disease etiology (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 48
- Authors
- Erim, Y., Tagay, S., Beckmann, M., Bein, S., Cicinnati, V., Beckebaum, S., Senf, W., & Schlaak, J. F.
- Affiliations
- Essen University Hospital (DE)
- Venue
- International Journal of Nursing Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 342-349
- ISSN
- 0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033155775
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatitis C virus research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
- Keywords
- hepatitis C, depression, anxiety, sense of coherence, social support, resilience, protective factors, mental health, psychosocial screening, gender differences, psychiatric symptoms, chronic hepatitis C
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Attitude to Health, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Germany, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Social Support, Nursing Methodology Research, Case-Control Studies, Hepatitis C, Chronic, Self Efficacy, Resilience, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review