Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effect of computer-assisted learning versus conventional teaching methods on the acquisition and retention of handwashing theory and skills in pre-qualification nursing students: A randomised controlled trial

Bloomfield, Jacqueline, Roberts, Julia, While, Alison·2010·International Journal of Nursing Studies
DOI 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.08.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.08.003

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Ayliffe, 1978, A test for hygienic hand infection, Journal of Clinical Pathology, 31, 923, 10.1136/jcp.31.10.923 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bauer, 1998, Nursing students’ blood pressure measurement following CD-ROM and conventional classroom instruction: a pilot study, International Journal of Medical Informatics, 50, 103, 10.1016/S1386-5056(98)00072-0 · doi:10.1016/s1386-5056(98)00072-0
  3. Bauer, 2001, Teaching blood pressure measurement: CD-ROM versus conventional classroom instruction, Journal of Nursing Education, 40, 138, 10.3928/0148-4834-20010301-10 · DOI
  4. Beeson, 1999, The effects of two teaching methods on nursing students’ factual knowledge and performance of psychomotor skills, Journal of Nursing Education, 38, 357, 10.3928/0148-4834-19991101-06 · DOI
  5. Bitzer, 1966, Clinical nursing instruction via the PLATO simulated laboratory, Nursing Research, 15, 144, 10.1097/00006199-196601520-00009 · DOI
  6. Bloomfield, 2008, Using computer assisted learning for clinical skills education in nursing: integrative review, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 63, 222, 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04653.x · DOI
  7. DeAmicis, 1997, Interactive videodisc instruction is an alternative method for learning and performing a critical nursing skill, Computers in Nursing, 15, 155
  8. Department of Health, 2001, Standard principles for preventing hospital acquired infections, Journal of Hospital Acquired Infection, 47, S21
  9. Gleydura, 1995, Multimedia training in nursing education, Computers in Nursing, 13, 169
  10. Greenhalgh, 2001, Computer-assisted learning in undergraduate medical education, British Medical Journal, 322, 40, 10.1136/bmj.322.7277.40 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Jang, 2005, Effects of a web-based teaching method on undergraduate nursing students’ learning of electrocardiography, Journal of Nursing Education, 44, 35, 10.3928/01484834-20050101-07 · DOI
  12. Jeffries, 2001, Computer versus lecture: a comparison of two methods of teaching oral medication administration in a nursing skills laboratory, Journal of Nursing Education, 40, 323, 10.3928/0148-4834-20011001-07 · DOI
  13. Jeffries, 2002, A comparison of student-centred versus traditional methods for teaching basic nursing skills in a learning laboratory, Nursing Education Perspectives, 23, 14
  14. Jeffries, 2003, Technology-based vs. traditional instruction—a comparison of two methods for teaching the skill of performing a 12-lead ECG, Nursing Education Perspectives, 24, 70, 10.1097/00024776-200803000-00006 · DOI
  15. Kim, 2003, An experimental study of students’ self-learning of the San-Yin-Jiao pressure procedure using CD-ROM or printed materials, Journal of Nursing Education, 42, 371, 10.3928/0148-4834-20030801-10 · DOI
  16. Leasure, 2000, Comparison of student outcomes and preferences in a traditional vs. World Wide-Web-based Baccalaureate Nursing Research course, Journal of Nursing Education, 39, 149, 10.3928/0148-4834-20000401-04 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Lewis, 2001, A review of evaluative studies of computer-based learning in nursing education, Nurse Education Today, 21, 26, 10.1054/nedt.2000.0494 · DOI
  18. Schneider, 2006, Improving the safety of medication using an interactive CD-ROM programme, American Journal of Health Systems Pharmacy, 63, 59, 10.2146/ajhp040609 · DOI
  19. Tegtemeyer, 2001, Computer-assisted learning in critical care: from ENIAC to HAL, Critical Care Medicine, 29, N177, 10.1097/00003246-200108001-00006 · DOI
  20. Tsai, 2004, Evaluation of computer-assisted multimedia instruction in intravenous injection, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41, 191, 10.1016/S0020-7489(03)00130-5 · doi:10.1016/s0020-7489(03)00130-5
  21. Washer, 2001, Barriers to the use of web-based learning in nurse education, Nurse Education Today, 21, 455, 10.1054/nedt.2001.0583 · DOI
  22. Wilson, 1998, Teacher versus the computer for instruction: a study, British Journal of Midwifery, 6, 655, 10.12968/bjom.1998.6.10.655 · doi:10.12968/bjom.1998.6.10.655

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Bloomfield, J., Roberts, J., & While, A.
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
287-294
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.08.003
OpenAlex
W1978515035
Cited by
158
References
2
FWCI
8.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of computer-assisted learning versus conventional teaching methods on the acquisition and retention of handwashing theory and skills in pre-qualification nursing students: A randomised controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.08.003
The paper
Bloomfield, J., Roberts, J., & While, A. (2010). The effect of computer-assisted learning versus conventional teaching methods on the acquisition and retention of handwashing theory and skills in pre-qualification nursing students: A randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.08.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.