The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Student Outcomes and Preferences in a Traditional vs. World Wide Web-Based Baccalaureate Nursing Research Course
Abstract
ABSTRACT The purpose of this project was to compare student outcomes in an undergraduate research course taught using both World Wide Web-based distance learning technology and traditional pedagogy. Reasons given for enrolling in the traditional classroom section included the perception of increased opportunity for interaction, decreased opportunity to procrastinate, immediate feedback, and more meaningful learning activities. Reasons for selecting the Web group section included cost, convenience, and flexibility. Overall, there was no significant difference in examination scores between the two groups on the three multiple-choice examinations or for the course grades (t = -.96, P = .343). Students who reported that they were self-directed and had the ability to maintain their own pace and avoid procrastination were most suited to Web-based courses. The Web-based classes can help provide opportunities for methods of communication that are not traditionally nurtured in traditional classroom settings. Secondary benefits of the World Wide Webbased course were to increase student confidence with the computer, and introduce them to skills and opportunities they would not have had in the classroom. Additionally, over time and with practice, student's writing skills improved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lia‐Hoagberg, B., Vellenga, B., Miller, M., & Li, T.-Y. (1999) · Journal of Professional Nursing · doi:10.1016/s8755-7223(99)80082-9 · Cited by 30
Cited by
Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Lai, B. Y. C., & Tan, H. S. (2005) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00544.x · Cited by 618
Procrastination in Online Courses: Performance and Attitudinal Differences
Elvers, G. C., Polzella, D. J., & Graetz, K. (2003) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15328023top3002_13 · Cited by 146
Shorey, S., Kowitlawakul, Y., Devi, M. K., Chen, H.-C., Soong, S. K. A., & Ang, E. (2018) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.011 · Cited by 112
Asunka, S. (2008) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v9i3.586 · Cited by 100
Why college students procrastinate in online courses: A self-regulated learning perspective
Cheng, S.-L., & Xie, K. (2021) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100807 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Leasure, A. R., Davis, L., & Thievon, S. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Nursing Education
- Publisher
- SLACK, Inc.
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 149-154
- ISSN
- 0148-4834 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-2421
- OpenAlex
- W1485531535
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 70.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Student Outcomes and Preferences in a Traditional vs. World Wide Web-Based Baccalaureate Nursing Research Course. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3928/0148-4834-20000401-04
- The paper
- Leasure, A. R., Davis, L., & Thievon, S. L. (2000). Comparison of Student Outcomes and Preferences in a Traditional vs. World Wide Web-Based Baccalaureate Nursing Research Course. Journal of Nursing Education. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-20000401-04
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.