CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 213Ethics in medical practiceEthics and bioethics in healthcareEthics in Business and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nurses’ ethical reasoning and behaviour: A literature review

Goethals, Sabine, Gastmans, Chris, de Casterlé, Bernadette Dierckx·2010·International Journal of Nursing Studies
DOI 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.12.010
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background Today's healthcare system requires that nurses have strong medical-technical competences and the ability to focus on the ethical dimension of care. For nurses, coping with the ethical dimension of care in practise is very difficult. Often nurses cannot act according to their own personal values and norms. This generates internal moral distress, which has a negative impact on both nurses and patients.Objectives The objective of this review is a thorough analysis of the literature about nurses' ethical practise particularly with regard to their processes of ethical reasoning and decision making and implementation of those decisions in practise.Design We conducted an extensive search of the electronic databases Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and PsycInfo for papers published between January 1988 and September 2008. A broad range of search keywords was used. The 39 selected articles had a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method design.Findings Despite the conceptual difficulties that the literature on the ethical practise of nurses suffers, in this review we understand nurses' ethical practise a complex process of reasoning, decision making, and implementation of the decision in practise. The process of decision making is more than a pure cognitive process; it is influenced by personal and contextual factors. The difficulties nurses encounter in their ethical conduct are linked to their difficult work environment. As a result, nurses often capitulate to the decisions made by others, which results in a conformist way of acting and less individually adapted care.Conclusions This review provides us with a more nuanced understanding of the way nurses reason and act in ethically difficult situations than emerged previously. If we want to support nurses in their ethical care and if we want to help them to change their conformist practises, more research is needed. Especially needed are in-depth qualitative studies that explore the experiences of nurses. Such studies could help us better understand not only how nurses reason and behave in practise but also the relationship between these two processes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.12.010

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 87 references

2 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dierckx de Casterlé, B. 1993. [Dissertation] The impact of education on ethical behaviour of nursing students. An Empirical Study (Dutch). University of Leuven, Leuven.
  2. Kim, Y.S., 1999. Effect of ethics education on nurses’ moral judgement [Dissertation]. University of Yonsei (in Korean).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 212

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Goethals, S., Gastmans, C., & de Casterlé, B. D.
Affiliations
UCLouvain (BE)
Corresponding author
Goethals, Sabine
ORCID
Gastmans, Chris
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
635-650
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.12.010
OpenAlex
W2048543971
Cited by
213
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
Keywords
ethical decision-making, moral distress, ethical dilemmas, nursing work environment
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Ethics, Nursing, Nurses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review