Collaborative nurse-led self-management support for primary care patients with anxiety, depressive or somatic symptoms: Cluster-randomised controlled trial (findings of the SMADS study)
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Collaborative, nurse-led care is a well-established model of ambulatory care in many healthcare systems. Nurses play a key role in managing patients' conditions as well as in enhancing symptom- and self-management skills. OBJECTIVE: The SMADS trial evaluated the effectiveness of a primary care-based, nurse-led, complex intervention to promote self-management in patients with anxiety, depressive or somatic symptoms. Change in self-efficacy 12 months post baseline was used as the primary outcome. DESIGN: The SMADS trial set up a two-arm, cluster randomised controlled trial in the city of Hamburg, a large metropolitan area in the North West of Germany. SETTING: We randomly allocated participating primary care practices to either the intervention group (IG), implementing a nurse-led collaborative care model, or to the control group (CG), where patients with the above psychosomatic symptoms received routine treatment. PARTICIPANTS: Patients from 18 to 65 years of age, regularly consulting a participating primary care practice, scoring≥5 on the anxiety, depressive or somatic symptom scales of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-D), German version. METHODS: A mixed model regression approach was used to analyse the outcome data. Analyses were based on the intention-to-treat population: All enrolled patients were analysed at their follow-up. Additionally, we reported results as effect sizes. The robustness of the results was investigated by performing an observed cases analysis. RESULTS: 325 participants (IG N=134, CG N=191) from ten practices in each study arm consented to take part and completed a baseline assessment. The mean group difference (ITT-LOCF, IG vs. CG) in self-efficacy at the post baseline follow-up (median 406days) was 1.65 points (95% CI 0.50-2.8) in favour of IG (p=0.004). This amounts to a small Cohen's d effect size of 0.33. An observed cases analysis (168 participants, IG=56, CG=105) resulted in a mean difference of 3.13 (95% CI 1.07-5.18, p=0.003) between the groups, amounting to a moderate effect size of d=0.51. CONCLUSION: A complex, nurse-led intervention, implemented as a collaborative care model, increased perceived self-efficacy in patients with symptoms of anxiety, depression or somatisation compare to control patients. For the first time in the German healthcare system, the SMADS trial validated the belief that a nurse can successfully complement the work of a general practitioner - particularly in supporting self-management of patients with psychosomatic symptoms and their psychosocial needs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Changes in perceived self-efficacy were reported in 14 studies.
“Changes in perceived self-efficacy were reported in 14 studies”
From Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice (2019) · cites this paper as [73]
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965 · see citing works
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2010) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.03.006 · Cited by 4,057 · see citing works
Patient Self-management of Chronic Disease in Primary Care
Bodenheimer, T. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.19.2469 · Cited by 3,598 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Based on improved self-efficacy patients can regain control of their own lives, gaining new confidence in their ability to perform a task, hence increasing self-management (Bodenheimer et al., 2002).”
BackgroundCollaborative care for depression and anxiety problems
Archer, J., Bower, P., Gilbody, S., Lovell, K., Richards, D., Gask, L., Dickens, C., & Coventry, P. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006525.pub2 · Cited by 1,126 · see citing works
Gilbody, S., Whitty, P., Grimshaw, J., & Thomas, R. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.23.3145 · Cited by 749 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dineen-Griffin, S., Garcia-Cardenas, V., Williams, K., & Benrimoj, S. I. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220116 · Cited by 600 · see citing works
“Low back pain 2 [88, 89] Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) 3 [31, 61, 90, 91] Cardiovascular disease (CVD) 3 [55, 59, 62, 63] Recurrent binge eating/ binge eating disorder 2 [92, 93] Unexplained chronic fatigue & chronic fatigue syndrome 2 [94, 95] Anxiety 2 [73, 74]”
BackgroundMorriss, R., Patel, S., Malins, S., Guo, B., Higton, F., James, M., Wu, M., Brown, P., Boycott, N., Kaylor-Hughes, C., et al. (2019) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1253-5 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
The role of relapse prevention for depression in collaborative care: a systematic review
Moriarty, A. S., Coventry, P. A., Hudson, J. L., Cook, N., Fenton, O. J., Bower, P., Lovell, K., Archer, J., Clarke, R., Richards, D. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.105 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Wassink-Vossen, S., Collard, R. M., Wardenaar, K. J., Verhaak, P. F. M., Rhebergen, D., Naarding, P., & Voshaar, R. C. O. (2019) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.09.003 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zimmermann, T., Puschmann, E., van den Bussche, H., Wiese, B., Ernst, A., Porzelt, S., Daubmann, A., & Scherer, M.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Zimmermann, Thomas
- Venue
- International Journal of Nursing Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 63
- Pages
- 101-111
- ISSN
- 0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2510032129
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 12.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Keywords
- nurse-led care, collaborative care, self-management support, self-efficacy, anxiety, depression, somatic symptoms, psychosomatic symptoms, primary care, complex interventions, Patient Health Questionnaire, intention-to-treat analysis, outpatient care
- MeSH terms
- Biobehavioral Sciences, Intersectoral Collaboration, Medically Unexplained Symptoms, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Services, Primary Health Care, Quality of Life, Regression Analysis, Self Care, Self Efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review