Cited by 41Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNutrition and Health in AgingDietetics, Nutrition, and Education

Protected Mealtimes in hospitals and nutritional intake: Systematic review and meta-analyses

Open access
Porter, Judi, Ottrey, Ella, Huggins, Catherine E.·2017·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Objectives Protected Mealtimes is an intervention developed to address the problem of malnutrition, particularly in the hospital setting. The intervention aims to provide interruption-free time to eat during a hospital admission, thus supporting increased nutritional intake. This review aimed to determine the impact of Protected Mealtimes on the nutritional intake of hospitalised patients. Design The review was registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42015023423) and followed the PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analyses were conducted of energy and protein intake. Data sources Seven databases were searched to identify relevant publications: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus, PsycInfo, Scopus, Cochrane Library (including NHS economic evaluations), and NICE clinical guidelines. A supplementary internet search of Google and Google Scholar was undertaken. The search terms protect* AND (mealtime* OR "meal time*") were used for all searches. Review methods Eligible studies were original research where Protected Mealtimes was implemented in hospitals and nutritional intake measured. Studies were selected for inclusion following a systematic process of identification, screening and eligibility assessment. Two authors completed the screening and eligibility assessment, and quality assessment of included studies. The Quality Criteria Checklist for Primary Research was used to evaluate the quality of each study, whilst the overall body of eviden…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.11.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The assessment of food energy intake has long been considered a key part of the nutritional assessment.

    “The assessment of food energy intake has long been considered a key part of the nutritional 1720 assessment [8, 106, 235].”

    From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [106]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Porter, J., Ottrey, E., & Huggins, C. E.
Affiliations
  • Eastern Health (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Porter, Judi
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
65
Pages
62-69
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2549505061
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Keywords
hospital malnutrition, nutritional intake, energy intake, protein intake, hospitalized patients
MeSH terms
Energy Intake, Dietary Proteins, Humans, Inpatients, Nutrition Assessment, Meals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review