Cited by 234Nursing education and managementPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsHealthcare Quality and Management

Hospital nursing organizational factors, nursing care left undone, and nurse burnout as predictors of patient safety: A structural equation modeling analysis

Liu, Xu, Zheng, Jing, Liu, Ke, Baggs, Judith Gedney, Liu, Jiali, Wu, Yan, You, Liming·2018·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Background Promotion of patient safety is among the most important goals and challenges of healthcare systems worldwide in countries including China. Donabedian's Structure-Process-Outcome model implies that patient safety is affected by hospital nursing organizational factors and nursing care process. However, studies are imperative for a clear understanding about the mechanisms by which patient safety is affected to guide practice. Objective The objective of this study was to explore the impact of hospital nursing work environment, workload, nursing care left undone, and nurse burnout on patient safety. Design This was a cross-sectional study conducted in 23 hospitals in Guangdong province, China in 2014. Data from nurses (n = 1542) responsible for direct care on 111 randomly sampled medical and surgical units were analyzed. Methods Work environment was measured by the Practice Environment Scale of Nursing Work Index. Workload was measured by day shift unit patient-nurse ratio and non-professional tasks conducted by nurses. Nursing care left undone was measured by 12 items addressing necessary nursing activities. Nurse burnout was measured by the emotional exhaustion subscale of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey. Patient safety was measured by three items indicating nurses' perception of overall patient safety and nine items addressing patient adverse events. Structural equation modeling was used to examine a hypothesized model that supposed work environment and workload have both direct and indirect effects on patient safety through nursing care left undone and nurse burnout. Results The findings generally supported the hypothesized model. Better work environment was associated with better patient safety both directly and indirectly. Lower workload primarily indirectly related to better patient safety. Nursing care left undone and nurse burnout were mediators negatively associated with patient safety. Conclusions Improving work environment, increasing nurse staffing levels, and providing sufficient support for nurses to spend more time on direct patient care would be beneficial to patient safety improvement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.05.005

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The better rated the work environment, the lower the likelihood of experiencing Emotional Exhaustion.

    “Five studies comprising diverse samples and settings concluded that the better rated the work environment, the lower the likelihood of experiencing Emotional Exhaustion [32, 47, 49, 51, 92]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [51]

  • Only Emotional Exhaustion predicts adverse events in another study.

    “but in another study, only Emotional Exhaustion predicted adverse events [51]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [51]

  • Emotional Exhaustion mediates the relationship between workload and patient safety.

    “Emotional Exhaustion mediated the relationship between workload and patient safety [51]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [51]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, X., Zheng, J., Liu, K., Baggs, J. G., Liu, J., Wu, Y., & You, L.
Affiliations
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Corresponding author
You, Liming
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
86
Pages
82-89
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2804846184
Cited by
234
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 4
FWCI
47.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
China Medical Board (04-808 & 10-021)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
patient safety, nursing work environment, nursing workload, nurse burnout, nurse staffing, adverse events, Donabedian structure-process-outcome model, emotional exhaustion
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Burnout, Professional, China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Hospital Administration, Humans, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Nursing Care, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review