The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence and risk factors of cancer-related fatigue: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background Cancer-related fatigue, one of the most frequent side-effects of cancer treatment, affects the well-being of patients. Despite the fact that the estimated prevalence and risk factors of cancer-related fatigue are widely reported, these results have not been synthesized.Objectives To systematically assess the prevalence of cancer-related fatigue, including stratification by fatigue degree, sex, age, therapeutic method, cancer-related fatigue scales, countries, and risk factors for cancer-related fatigue.Design Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Data sources PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL Plus, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database (CNKI), Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM), and Weipu Database (VIP) were comprehensively searched for observational studies investigating the prevalence and risk factors of cancer-related fatigue from inception to March 31st, 2019.Review methods Original journal articles were included which met the inclusion criteria. The quality of the included studies was evaluated independently by two investigators. Meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 12.0 software package, with estimates of cancer-related fatigue from pooled using a random-effects model.Results In total, 2641 articles were screened and data from 84 studies involving 144,813 subjects were used in meta-analysis. The prevalence of cancer-related fatigue in individual studies varied from 14.03% to 100%. The pooled prevalence of cancer-related fatigue was 52% (95% confidence interval, CI: 48% to 56%, I 2 = 99.7%, P < 0.0001). After controlling for confounding variables, the following risk factors were associated with cancer-related fatigue: poor performance status (odds ratio, OR = 6.58, 95% CI: 2.60 to 16.67, I 2 = 75.2%, P < 0.0001), chemoradiotherapy (OR = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.90 to 2.67, I 2 =0%, P<0.0001), female sex (OR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.51 to 2.84, I 2 = 41.2%, P<0.0001), insomnia (OR = 2.83, 95% CI: 1.22 to 6.57, I 2 = 98.3%, P = 0.015), neuroticism (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.43, I 2 = 88.9%, P = 0.01), pain (OR = 2.64, 95% CI: 1.20 to 5.80, I 2 = 95.3%, P = 0.016), and depression (OR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.70 to 2.93, I 2 = 98.1%, P < 0.0001).Conclusion The current analysis indicates an overall pooled prevalence of cancer-related fatigue of 52%. Poor performance status, chemoradiotherapy, female sex, insomnia, neuroticism, pain, and depression were identified as risk factors for cancer-related fatigue. Understanding the risk factors of cancer-related fatigue can provide the healthcare personnel with the theoretical basis for the management and treatment of the patients.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The incidence and severity of fatigue is also higher in females. 17”
From Mindfulness and Psychosocial Symptoms in People with Cancer: Testing Rumination and Experiential Avoidance as Mediators, and Sex as a Moderator. (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“fatigue is closely associated cross-sectionally with rumination and constructs mediated by rumination such as anxiety and depression.1,17,22,25,44”
From Mindfulness and Psychosocial Symptoms in People with Cancer: Testing Rumination and Experiential Avoidance as Mediators, and Sex as a Moderator. (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
Cites
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., & Jemal, A. (2018) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21442 · Cited by 16,632
Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Koh, W.-J., Abu‐Rustum, N. R., Bean, S. M., Bradley, K. A., Campos, S. M., Cho, K. R., Chon, H. S., Chu, C., Clark, R., Cohn, D. E., et al. (2019) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.0001 · Cited by 1,058
Critical appraisal of the health research literature: prevalence or incidence of a health problem.
Loney, P., Chambers, L. W., BENNETT, K. J., Roberts, J. G., & Stratford, P. W. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 550
Pearce, A. M., Haas, M. R., Viney, R. C., Pearson, S., Haywood, P., Brown, C. S. B., & Ward, R. L. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184360 · Cited by 542
Cancer-Related Fatigue and Its Associations With Depression and Anxiety: A Systematic Review
Brown, L. F., & Kroenke, K. (2009) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1016/s0033-3182(09)70835-7 · Cited by 390
Cancer-related fatigue and associated disability in post-treatment cancer survivors
Jones, J. M., Olson, K. L., Catton, P. A., Catton, C., Fleshner, N. E., Krzyzanowska, M. K., McCready, D. R., Wong, R. K. S., Jiang, H., & Howell, D. (2015) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-015-0450-2 · Cited by 368
Wang, X. S., Zhao, F., Fisch, M. J., O’Mara, A. M., Cella, D. F., Mendoza, T. R., & Cleeland, C. S. (2013) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.28434 · Cited by 367
The relationship between fatigue and sleep in cancer patients: a review
Ancoli‐Israel, S., Moore, P., & Jones, V. E. (2001) · European Journal of Cancer Care · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2354.2001.00263.x · Cited by 327
The Health Status of Nonparticipants in a Population-based Health Study: The Hordaland Health Study
Knudsen, A. K., Hotopf, M., Skogen, J. C., Overland, S., & Mykletun, A. (2010) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwq257 · Cited by 322
Nipp, R. D., El‐Jawahri, A., Moran, S. M., D'Arpino, S. M., Johnson, P. C., Lage, D. E., Wong, R. L., Pirl, W. F., Traeger, L., Lennes, I. T., et al. (2017) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.30912 · Cited by 230
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Lamino, 2011, Prevalence and comorbidity of pain and fatigue in women with breast cancer, Revista Da Escola De Enfermagem Da Usp, 45, 496
- Mai, 2018, Relationship between smoking type 2 diabetes mellitus among male smokers, Chin J Public Health, 34, 1078
- Nowicki, 2017, The assessment of cancer-related fatigue syndrome in patients with lung cancer during palliative chemotherapy, Advances in Respiratory Medicine, 85, 69, 10.5603/ARM.2017.0013 · DOI
- Tan, 2009, Correlation between cancer fatigue and clinical symptoms in elderly patients with malignant tumor, Nurs J Chin People's Liberation Army, 26, 26
- Wang, 2011, Investigation on the cancer-related and fatigue-relief strategies of patients with malignant urinary system tumors, Chin J Modern Med, 21, 2998
- Xue, 2012, Research progress on evaluation tools and indicators of cancer-induced fatigue, Chin J Nurs, 47, 859
- Yuan, 2015, Progress in research on prevalence and control of smoking and second hand smoking women in China: a review, Chin J Public Health, 31, 1268
- Yue, 2015, Relationship between clinical features and cancer related fatigue in patients with bone tumor, Prac J Cancer, 463
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prevalence of cancer-related fatigue based on severity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Kang, Y.-E., Yoon, J.-H., Park, N.-H., Ahn, Y., Lee, E., & Son, C. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-39046-0 · Cited by 165
Belloni, S., Arrigoni, C., & Caruso, R. (2021) · Acta Oncologica · doi:10.1080/0284186x.2021.1962543 · Cited by 74
Chen, X., Li, J., Chen, C., Zhang, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, Y., Zhou, L., & Hu, X. (2023) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-023-01363-0 · Cited by 71
Psychosocial and Integrative Oncology: Interventions Across the Disease Trajectory.
Carlson, L. E. (2023) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-032620-031757 · Cited by 56
“…of pain was > 50% in all cancer types, with the highest prevalence in head and neck cancer patients (van den Beuken-van construct in terms of etiology and maintenance, and as such there is latitude for psychological and other nonpharmacological interventions to impact the pain experience.”
BackgroundSleight, A. G., Crowder, S. L., Skarbinski, J., Coen, P. M., Parker, N. H., Hoogland, A. I., Gonzalez, B. D., Playdon, M. C., Cole, S. W., Ose, J., et al. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14081982 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, Y., He, B., Jiang, M., Yang, Y., Wang, C., Huang, C., & Han, L.
- Affiliations
- Lanzhou University (CN)
- Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
- Gansu Provincial Hospital (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Han, Lin
- Venue
- International Journal of Nursing Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 111
- Pages
- 103707
- ISSN
- 0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3041694213
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 90
- Citations by year
- 2026: 58 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lanzhou University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (lzujbky-2018-ct05, lzujbky-2020–10, lzujbky-2016-ct14, lzujbky-2018–77)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
- Keywords
- cancer-related fatigue, prevalence, risk factors, performance status, chemoradiotherapy, insomnia, sex differences, cancer treatment side effects, fatigue severity, cancer patients, quality of life, prognostic factors, prognostic risk score
- MeSH terms
- China, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Prevalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review