Association between intrapartum epidural use and maternal postpartum depression presenting for medical care: a population-based, matched cohort study
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate whether intrapartum epidural use is associated with maternal postpartum depression presenting for medical care. Methods Population-based, matched cohort study including all adult nulliparous women in Ontario, Canada from 2006 to 2012 without a history of depression, who had a term vaginal delivery. Seventy covariates including maternal demographics, medical and psychiatric conditions, prenatal and perinatal complications, and healthcare utilization were measured. Primary exposure was intrapartum epidural use. Primary outcome was the onset of depression requiring medical care within 12 months postpartum; and the secondary outcome was self-harm. Results A total of 40303 women who received an intrapartum epidural were matched 1:1 on age, year of cohort entry, and propensity score to an equal number of women who did not receive an intrapartum epidural. Overall rate of new onset depression presenting to the healthcare system was 0.88% within 12 months postpartum. Intrapartum epidural use was not associated with maternal postpartum physician or hospital visits (adjusted HR 1.05 [95% CI 0.87 to 1.28]) or self-harm (unadjusted HR 0.91 [95% CI 0.57 to 1.48]). Conclusions Intrapartum epidural use was not associated with maternal postpartum depression presenting to the healthcare system in term nulliparous women who had a vaginal delivery. Further research is needed to determine if intrapartum epidural use is associated with postpartum depression among women who don'…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Across delivery modes, the relationship between neuraxial anesthesia and postpartum depression is best characterized as neutral at the population level, with potential protective effects in select clinical contexts.
“Across delivery modes, the relationship between neuraxial anesthesia and postpartum depression (PPD) appears complex but is best characterized as neutral at the population level, with potential protective effects in select clinical contexts has been described as either protective or neutral at various amounts of time postpartum across many studies.37–51”
Many studies demonstrate a neutral association between neuraxial anesthesia and postpartum depression.
“Many studies demonstrate a neutral association”
Across observational studies, cohort analyses, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, neuraxial anesthesia does not appear to increase the risk of postpartum depression at the population level.
“Across observational studies, cohort analyses, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, neuraxial anesthesia does not appear to increase the risk of PPD at the population level.”
Neuraxial anesthesia is not associated with increased risk of postpartum depression and may have neutral or protective effects, particularly compared with general anesthesia for cesarean delivery.
“Collectively, available evidence indicates that neuraxial anesthesia likely does not increase the risk of postpartum depression and may exhibit either neutral or modest protective effects in labor.37–51”
Cites
Gelaye, B., Rondon, M. B., Araya, R., & Williams, M. A. (2016) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(16)30284-x · Cited by 1,155 · see citing works
Wisner, K. L., Sit, D. K. Y., McShea, M. C., Rizzo, D. M., Zoretich, R. A., Hughes, C. L., Eng, H. F., Luther, J. F., Wisniewski, S. R., Costantino, M. L., et al. (2013) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.87 · Cited by 1,091 · see citing works
Stewart, D. E., & Vigod, S. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp1607649 · Cited by 500 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fagan, J., Dufour, S., Duet, S., Downs, E., Siddaiah, H., Viswanath, O., Shekoohi, S., & Kaye, A. (2026) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s579920
- Authors
- Wu, Y. (., McArthur, E., Dixon, S., Dirk, J. S., & Welk, B. K.
- Affiliations
- London Health Sciences Centre (CA)
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Welk, B.K.
- Venue
- International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 35
- Pages
- 10-16
- ISSN
- 0959-289X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2800399178
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
- MOHLTC
- Academic Medical Organization of Southwestern Ontario
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry
- Western University
- Lawson Health Research Institute
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Keywords
- postpartum depression, maternal mental health, nulliparous women, term vaginal delivery, self-harm, health care utilization, perinatal complications
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Cohort Studies, Analgesia, Epidural, Analgesia, Obstetrical, Depression, Postpartum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review