Cited by 22Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAnesthesia and Pain ManagementMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Association between intrapartum epidural use and maternal postpartum depression presenting for medical care: a population-based, matched cohort study

Wu, Y. (Maria), McArthur, E., Dixon, S., Dirk, J.S., Welk, B.K.·2018·International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate whether intrapartum epidural use is associated with maternal postpartum depression presenting for medical care. Methods Population-based, matched cohort study including all adult nulliparous women in Ontario, Canada from 2006 to 2012 without a history of depression, who had a term vaginal delivery. Seventy covariates including maternal demographics, medical and psychiatric conditions, prenatal and perinatal complications, and healthcare utilization were measured. Primary exposure was intrapartum epidural use. Primary outcome was the onset of depression requiring medical care within 12 months postpartum; and the secondary outcome was self-harm. Results A total of 40303 women who received an intrapartum epidural were matched 1:1 on age, year of cohort entry, and propensity score to an equal number of women who did not receive an intrapartum epidural. Overall rate of new onset depression presenting to the healthcare system was 0.88% within 12 months postpartum. Intrapartum epidural use was not associated with maternal postpartum physician or hospital visits (adjusted HR 1.05 [95% CI 0.87 to 1.28]) or self-harm (unadjusted HR 0.91 [95% CI 0.57 to 1.48]). Conclusions Intrapartum epidural use was not associated with maternal postpartum depression presenting to the healthcare system in term nulliparous women who had a vaginal delivery. Further research is needed to determine if intrapartum epidural use is associated with postpartum depression among women who don'…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.04.005

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, Y. (., McArthur, E., Dixon, S., Dirk, J. S., & Welk, B. K.
Affiliations
  • London Health Sciences Centre (CA)
  • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA)
Corresponding author
Welk, B.K.
Venue
International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
35
Pages
10-16
ISSN
0959-289X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2800399178
Cited by
22
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
  • MOHLTC
  • Academic Medical Organization of Southwestern Ontario
  • Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry
  • Western University
  • Lawson Health Research Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
postpartum depression, maternal mental health, nulliparous women, term vaginal delivery, self-harm, health care utilization, perinatal complications
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Cohort Studies, Analgesia, Epidural, Analgesia, Obstetrical, Depression, Postpartum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review