Cited by 276Technology Adoption and User BehaviourERP Systems Implementation and ImpactQuality and Supply Management

Adoption of e-procurement in Hong Kong: An empirical research

Gunasekaran, Angappa, Ngai, Eric W.T.·2008·International Journal of Production Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.04.012

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Critical factors for successfully implementing e-procurement are management commitment to financial and technological support.

    “According to Gunasekaran and Ngai [3], the critical factors for successfully implementing e-procurement are management commitment to financial and technological support.”
  • Training is identified as a critical success factor in the initial adoption decision of technology at an organisational level.

    “Within the eprocurement literature, training is identified as a critical success factor in the initial adoption decision of technology at an organisational level (Au et al., 2014; Gunasekaran and Ngai, 2008; Tokta ş -Palut et al., 2014)”

    From Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement (2018) · cites this paper as Gunasekaran and Ngai, 2008

  • Top management support has been found to be critical for successful e-procurement implementation in past research.

    “top management support has been found to be critical for successful e-procurement implementation in past research (Gunasekaran and Ngai, 2008).”

    From Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement (2018) · cites this paper as Gunasekaran and Ngai, 2008

  • A significant proportion of extant e-procurement literature focuses on decision-making at an organisational level, investigating the factors that drive organisations towards the adoption of such technologies.

    “A significant proportion of extant e-procurement literature focuses on decision-making at an organisational level, investigating the factors that drive organisations towards the adoption of such technologies (Angeles and Nath, 2007; Gunasekaran and Ngai, 2008; Mishra et al. 2007; Wu et al. 2007).”

    From Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement (2018) · cites this paper as Gunasekaran and Ngai, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gunasekaran, A., & Ngai, E. W. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (US)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Corresponding author
Ngai, Eric W.T.
Venue
International Journal of Production Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
113
Issue
1
Pages
159-175
ISSN
0925-5273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065523799
Cited by
276
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 25
FWCI
27.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Production Economics (publishedVersion)
  • CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
Keywords
e-procurement, technology adoption, success factors, barriers to adoption, Hong Kong, top management support, interoperability, information security, electronic data interchange, conceptual framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review