Adoption of e-procurement in Hong Kong: An empirical research
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Critical factors for successfully implementing e-procurement are management commitment to financial and technological support.
“According to Gunasekaran and Ngai [3], the critical factors for successfully implementing e-procurement are management commitment to financial and technological support.”
From Impact of E-Procurement Adoption on Company Performance: Evidence from Indonesian Manufacturing Industry (2021) · cites this paper as Gunasekaran and Ngai [3]
Training is identified as a critical success factor in the initial adoption decision of technology at an organisational level.
“Within the eprocurement literature, training is identified as a critical success factor in the initial adoption decision of technology at an organisational level (Au et al., 2014; Gunasekaran and Ngai, 2008; Tokta ş -Palut et al., 2014)”
From Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement (2018) · cites this paper as Gunasekaran and Ngai, 2008
Top management support has been found to be critical for successful e-procurement implementation in past research.
“top management support has been found to be critical for successful e-procurement implementation in past research (Gunasekaran and Ngai, 2008).”
From Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement (2018) · cites this paper as Gunasekaran and Ngai, 2008
A significant proportion of extant e-procurement literature focuses on decision-making at an organisational level, investigating the factors that drive organisations towards the adoption of such technologies.
“A significant proportion of extant e-procurement literature focuses on decision-making at an organisational level, investigating the factors that drive organisations towards the adoption of such technologies (Angeles and Nath, 2007; Gunasekaran and Ngai, 2008; Mishra et al. 2007; Wu et al. 2007).”
From Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement (2018) · cites this paper as Gunasekaran and Ngai, 2008
Cites
Key issues in e-procurement: Procurement implementation and operation in the public sector
Croom, S. R., & Brandon-Jones, A. (2005) · Journal of Public Procurement · doi:10.1108/jopp-05-03-2005-b004 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
The Adoption of Electronic Procurement in Singapore
Kheng, C. B., & Al-Hawamdeh, S. (2002) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1023/a:1013388018056 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An empirical investigation of factors affecting e-collaboration diffusion in SMEs
Chan, F. T. S., Yee-Loong Chong, A., & Zhou, L. (2012) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.04.004 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement
Brandon-Jones, A., & Kauppi, K. (2018) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-06-2015-0346 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Li, Y.-H. (2008) · 2008 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering 15th Annual Conference Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icmse.2008.4668890 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Ramkumar, M., Schoenherr, T., Wagner, S. M., & Jenamani, M. (2019) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.06.003 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
The impact of barriers and benefits of e-procurement on its adoption decision: An empirical analysis
Toktaş-Palut, P., Baylav, E., Teoman, S., & Altunbey, M. (2014) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.07.017 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Singh, P. K., & Chan, S. W. (2022) · Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity · doi:10.3390/joitmc8020061 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“In further research, in various business processes for sustainability in green procurement, and also improved supply chain performance, the use of electronic technologies, as well as the internet of things (IoT), EDI, digital procurement, RFID, and blockchain, may be explored.”
BackgroundInfluentialMasudin, I., Aprilia, G. D., Nugraha, A., & Restuputri, D. P. (2021) · Logistics · doi:10.3390/logistics5010016 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
“According to Gunasekaran and Ngai [3], the critical factors for successfully implementing e-procurement are management commitment to financial and technological support.”
BackgroundChen, Y., Bretschneider, S., Stritch, J. M., Darnall, N., & Hsueh, L. (2022) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2021.1874497 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
An Empirical Evaluation Of The Potential Of Public E-Procurement To Reduce Corruption
Neupane, A., Soar, J., & Vaidya, K. (2014) · Australasian Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.3127/ajis.v18i2.780 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Sánchez-Rodríguez, C., Martínez-Lorente, A. R., & Hemsworth, D. (2020) · Benchmarking: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-12-2018-0413 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Institutional responses to electronic procurement in the public sector
Doherty, N. F., McConnell, D. J., & Ellis‐Chadwick, F. (2013) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-04-2012-0048 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
A Success Model for the Malaysian Government e-Procurement System: The Buyer Perspective
Kassim, E. S., & Hussin, H. (2013) · International Journal of Electronic Government Research · doi:10.4018/jegr.2013010101 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
The impact of e-procurement on institutional quality
Mélon, L., & Spruk, R. (2020) · Journal of Public Procurement · doi:10.1108/jopp-07-2019-0050 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Chomchaiya, S., & Esichaikul, V. (2016) · Information Technology & People · doi:10.1108/itp-12-2013-0210 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
A survey on adoption of e-procurement in Indian organisations
Gupta, M., & Narain, R. (2012) · International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management · doi:10.1504/ijicbm.2012.044019 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Positive and negative impacts of the adoption of e-procurement solutions: the Italian market case
Belisari, S., Appolloni, A., & Cerruti, C. (2019) · International Journal of Procurement Management · doi:10.1504/ijpm.2019.098553 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Hung, W.-H., Lin, C.-P., Tai, Y.-M., Ho, C.-F., & Jou, J.-J. (2014) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2013.837431 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Achieving e-procurement benefits in an aviation MRO environment
Basak, M. (2015) · Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.31387/oscm0230160 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Information Technology readiness index for adoption of e-procurement
Padhi, S. S., & Mohapatra, P. K. J. (2011) · Electronic Government, an International Journal · doi:10.1504/eg.2011.037695 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
E-Procurement Adoption in Indonesian Government: A Study of Toe Model
Ardy Susantya, S., Aswar, K., Sumardjo, M., Panjaitan, I., & Andreas, A. (2022) · Innovative Marketing · doi:10.21511/im.18(3).2022.09 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gunasekaran, A., & Ngai, E. W. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (US)
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Ngai, Eric W.T.
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 159-175
- ISSN
- 0925-5273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065523799
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 27.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Production Economics (publishedVersion)
- CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
- Keywords
- e-procurement, technology adoption, success factors, barriers to adoption, Hong Kong, top management support, interoperability, information security, electronic data interchange, conceptual framework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review