Cited by 34E-Government and Public ServicesPublic Procurement and PolicyTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

A Success Model for the Malaysian Government e-Procurement System: The Buyer Perspective

Open access
Kassim, Erne Suzila, Hussin, Husnayati·2013·International Journal of Electronic Government Research

Abstract

In Malaysia, there has been a tremendous effort in implementing e-government as a national agenda to increase public transparency, improve sector efficiency and effectiveness, and reduce public expenditure through lower operational costs. One of the e-government applications is the ePerolehan, a government-to-business (G2B) system that enables online public procurement coordination and transaction between government and businesses. However, there has been a lack of empirical research findings in evaluating the success and actual value of the system and understanding the usage factors among government users. Hence, this research was undertaken to investigate the level of ePerolehan system success and the factors that contribute to this success, as perceived by the government users. The structural equation modeling results suggest the use of the Malaysian public e-procurement system has significant and positive influence to success, measured as transparency, service performance, efficiency, and information quality. The results also indicated that the main significant success factors of the ePerolehan system are found to be system compatibility, user attitude, organizational learning, mimetic pressure, and supplier expectation. The findings provide several important implications not only for the government-to-business discipline, but also for e-government research and practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4018/jegr.2013010101

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transparency, efficiency, and information quality are the most important factors contributing to the success of e-procurement.

    “Their study shows that transparency, efficiency, and information quality are the most important factors contributing to the success of e-procurement.”

    From Impact of E-Procurement Adoption on Company Performance: Evidence from Indonesian Manufacturing Industry (2021) · cites this paper as Kassim and Hussin [39]

    The Results and Additional information sections treat transparency, efficiency, and information quality as measures of e-procurement success. But the paper ranks service performance highest, ahead of all three, and describes the three as outcomes of system use rather than factors contributing to its success. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. George, P. (2007). User acceptance of the ePerolehan system among government users in Malaysia, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universiti Putra Malaysia.
  2. Lamming, R. C., Caldwell, N. D., Harrison, D. A., & Phillips, W. E. (2001). Transparency in supply relationship, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 37(4), 4 -10.
  3. Magrini, P. (2005). Transparency in public e-Procurement: The Italian perspective, OECD Papers, 5(10), 1-44.
  4. Rashid, Z. A. (2007). ePerolehan: A breakthrough for e-commerce in the Malaysian government, Public Sector ICT Management Review, 1(1), 20-24.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kassim, E. S., & Hussin, H.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY)
  • International Islamic University Malaysia (MY)
Venue
International Journal of Electronic Government Research
Published
2013-01-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
1-18
ISSN
  • 1548-3886 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-3894
OpenAlex
W2034970156
Cited by
34
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.91
Type
journal article
Language
ng
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Electronic Government Research (publishedVersion)
  • The International Islamic University Malaysia Repository (The International Islamic University Malaysia) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
e-procurement, e-government, system success factors, system compatibility, user attitudes, organizational learning, mimetic pressure, transparency, service performance, information quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review