The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach
Open accessAbstract
This paper develops an operational perspective of supply chain sustainability, by considering it as a risk management process. It explores the nature of sustainability-related supply chain risks, distinguishes them from typical supply chain risks and develops an analytical process for their management. An empirical study is conducted to generate insights about how sustainability-related risks should be managed in an integrated way. A mixed method approach is adopted for data collection and analysis. Through an extensive literature review and personal interviews, 30 risks across the three main pillars of sustainability (environmental, social and economic) are identified first. A large survey across different industrial sectors and two exploratory empirical case studies in two textile manufacturing companies are subsequently conducted to assess and analyse several dimensions of sustainability-related risk. The failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) technique is utilised to assess the relative importance of the selected risks, to identify their potential causes and effects and test potential correlations between the identified risks. Based on the findings of the study, risk treatment strategies are proposed for all the identified sustainability-related supply chain risks. The findings show that endogenous environmental risks are perceived to be the most important across different industries and the interconnectedness between several sustainability-related risks is very high. This points to the need for integrated sustainability risk management approaches to facilitate the development of effective sustainable strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x · Cited by 71,491
Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility
(2007) · Strategic Direction · doi:10.1108/sd.2007.05623ead.006 · Cited by 7,410
Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.750 · Cited by 3,137
Perspectives in supply chain risk management
Tang, C. S. (2006) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.12.006 · Cited by 2,577
Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources
Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.820 · Cited by 2,252
Porta, M. (2026) · doi:10.1093/acref/9780197663639.001.0001 · Cited by 2,175
Managing Disruption Risks in Supply Chains
Kleindorfer, P. R., & Saad, G. H. (2005) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00009.x · Cited by 2,088
Managing Risk To Avoid Supply-Chain Breakdown
Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004) · MIT Sloan Management Review · Cited by 1,860
The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility
Oana, V. (2006) · Harvard business review · Cited by 1,859
Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide
Vose, D. (2000) · Cited by 1,747
Cited by
Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation
Aven, T. (2016) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023 · Cited by 1,713
“One example to add is the link between sustainability and risk, which is an emerging research topic; see e.g. Fahimnia et al. (2015) and Giannakis and Papadopoulos (2016) .”
BackgroundReconfigurable supply chain: the X-network
Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1774679 · Cited by 501
Riahi, Y., Saikouk, T., Gunasekaran, A., & Badraoui, I. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114702 · Cited by 400
Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., Albores, P., & Emrouznejad, A. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121562 · Cited by 279
CSR ‘sustainability’ practices and firm performance in an emerging economy
Sardana, D., Gupta, N., Kumar, V., & Terziovski, M. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120766 · Cited by 238
Metadata
- Authors
- Giannakis, M., & Papadopoulos, T.
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 171
- Pages
- 455-470
- ISSN
- 0925-5273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W980222584
- Cited by
- 733
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 88.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.06.032
- The paper
- Giannakis, M., & Papadopoulos, T. (2016). Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach. International Journal of Production Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.06.032
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.