Cited by 32Polymer Foaming and CompositesBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics

Supercritical CO2 technology for one-pot foaming and sterilization of polymeric scaffolds for bone regeneration

Open access
Santos-Rosales, Víctor, Magariños, Beatriz, Starbird, Ricardo, Suárez-González, Javier, Fariña, José B., Alvarez-Lorenzo, Carmen, García-González, Carlos A.·2021·International Journal of Pharmaceutics

Abstract

Sterilization is a quite challenging step in the development of novel polymeric scaffolds for regenerative medicine since conventional sterilization techniques may significantly alter their morphological and physicochemical properties. Supercritical (sc) sterilization, i.e. the use of scCO2 as a sterilizing agent, emerges as a promising sterilization method due to the mild operational conditions and excellent penetration capability. In this work, a scCO2 protocol was implemented for the one-pot preparation and sterilization of poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL)/poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) scaffolds. The sterilization conditions were established after screening against both Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) and Gram-negative (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa) vegetative bacteria and spores of Bacillus stearothermophilus, Bacillus pumilus and Bacillus atrophaeus. The transition from the sterilization conditions (140 bar, 39 °C) to the compressed foaming (60 bar, 26 °C) was performed through controlled depressurization (3.2 bar/min) and CO2 liquid flow. Controlled depressurization/pressurization cycles were subsequently applied. Using this scCO2 technology toolbox, sterile scaffolds of well-controlled pore architecture were obtained. This sterilization procedure successfully achieved not only SAL-6 against well-known resistant bacteria endospores but also improved the scaffold morphologies compared to standard gamma radiation sterilization procedures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120801

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PLCL scaffolds prepared by supercritical carbon dioxide contain abundant pore structure, facilitating cell adhesion and proliferation, interstitial fluid transport, and vascular and tissue ingrowth, with applications in bone, nerve, vascular, and cartilage repair.

    “In addition, PLCL scaffolds prepared by the supercritical carbon dioxide method contain abundant pore structure, which facilitates cell adhesion and proliferation, interstitial fluid transport, and vascular and tissue ingrowth within the scaffold, so they have many applications in bone tissue engineering, nerve tissue engineering, vascular tissue engineering and cartilage repair [13, 118–120].”

    From Application of PLCL as a biodegradable polymer in biomedical engineering (2026) · cites this paper as [119]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Implantable medical devices are not allowed to have pathogen contamination with a probability of higher than one in a million.

    “On the other hand, implantable medical devices are not allowed to have pathogen contamination with a probability of higher than one in a million [216].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 32

Authors
Santos-Rosales, V., Magariños, B., Starbird, R., Suárez-González, J., Fariña, J. B., Alvarez-Lorenzo, C., & García-González, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica (CR)
  • Universidad de La Laguna (ES)
Venue
International Journal of Pharmaceutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
605
Pages
120801
ISSN
0378-5173 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3172159730
Cited by
32
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Pharmaceutics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repositorio institucional da Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (University of Santiago de Compostela) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repositorio institucional da Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (University of Santiago de Compostela) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica
  • Xunta de Galicia (ED481A, [ED431C 2020/17], ED431C, ED431F, ED481A‐2018, RTI2018-094131-A-I00)
  • Agencia Estatal de Investigación (RYC2014-15239, ED431C 2020/17, SAF2017-83118-R)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer Foaming and Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Keywords
supercritical CO2 foaming, polymer scaffolds, bone regeneration, polycaprolactone, PLGA, endospores, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus stearothermophilus, Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus atrophaeus, scaffold morphology, pore structure
MeSH terms
Bacillus, Bone Regeneration, Carbon Dioxide, Sterilization, Technology, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review