Cited by 28Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and RehabilitationPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of smoking on developing cochlea

Abstract

Objective Maternal tobacco smoking has negative effects on fetal growth. The influence of smoking during pregnancy on the developing cochlea has not been estimated, although smoking has been positively associated with hearing loss in adults. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of maternal smoking on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) of healthy neonates.Methods This study was undertaken as part of neonatal screening for hearing impairment and involved both ears of 200 newborns. Newborns whose mothers reported smoking during pregnancy (n=200 ears) were compared to a control group of newborns (n=200 ears), whose mothers were non-smokers. Exposure to tobacco was characterized as low (<5 cigarettes per day, n=88 ears), moderate (5< or =cigarettes per day<10, n=76) or high (> or =10 cigarettes per day, n=36).Results In exposed neonates, TEOAEs mean response (across frequency) and mean amplitude at 4000Hz was significantly lower than in non-exposed neonates. Comparisons between exposed newborns' subgroups revealed no significant differences. However, by comparing each subgroup to control group, we found statistically significant decreases of TEOAEs amplitudes at 4000Hz for all three groups. Mean TEOAEs responses of highly exposed newborns were also significantly lower in comparison to our control group.Conclusion In utero, exposure to tobacco smoking seems to have a small impact on outer hair cells. These effects seem to be equally true for all exposed newborns, regardless of the degree of exposure. Further studies are needed in order to establish a potential negative effect of maternal smoking on the neonate's hearing acuity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.01.015

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Thornton, 1999, Maturation of click evoked otoacoustic emissions in the first few days of life, vol. 1, 21

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 28

Metadata

Authors
Korres, S., Riga, M., Balatsouras, D., Papadakis, C., Kanellos, P., & Ferekidis, E.
Affiliations
  • Hippocration General Hospital (GR)
  • Tzaneion General Hospital (GR)
  • Chania General Hospital ”St. George” (GR)
Corresponding author
Riga, Maria
Venue
International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
71
Issue
5
Pages
781-786
ISSN
0165-5876 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2209414366
Cited by
28
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
maternal smoking, prenatal tobacco exposure, cochlear development, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, neonatal hearing, outer hair cells, hearing loss, newborn hearing screening
MeSH terms
Administration, Inhalation, Adult, Cochlea, Female, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Nicotine, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Smoking, Neonatal Screening, Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review