Cited by 1Language Development and DisordersVoice and Speech DisordersPhonetics and Phonology Research

Studying some elicited verbal prosodic patterns in Egyptian specific language impaired children

Azab, Safinaz Nagib, Ashour, Heba·2015·International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

Abstract

Background Prosody is the aspect of language that conveys emotion by changes in tone, rhythm, and emphasis during speech and the term specific language impairment (SLI) refers to children whose language development is substantially below their chronological age, despite a normal nonverbal intelligence and no obvious neurological or physiological impairments, or emotional and/or social difficulties that could impact language use.Purpose To assess prosodic skills in Arabic speaking children with specific language impairment, in order to answer the question "Are SLI children dysprosodic?" And to be put in consideration while choosing and applying the training procedure hence, qualifies the rehabilitation program.Methods Thirty Egyptian normal children and 30 Egyptian children with specific language impairment (SLI) aged between 4 and 6 years were included in this study and were subjected to psychometric evaluation, audio logical assessment, Arabic language test, articulation test, and assessment protocol of prosody.Results Egyptian specific language impaired children have lower prosodic skills scores than control group with positive significant correlation between total language ages of specific language impaired children and total prosodic scores.Conclusion Egyptian specific language impaired children have dysprosodic skills and the intervention program must include prosodic rehabilitation program in order to achieve higher improvement level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.11.001

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-linguistic abilities (e.g., sound discrimination, expressive prosody, phonological working memory, associative learning, executive skills) may significantly contribute to children's linguistic difficulties.

    “The assessment should also be extended to non-linguistic abilities (e.g., sound discrimination, expressive prosody, phonological working memory, associative learning, executive skills) that may significantly contribute to children’s linguistic difficulties [90,91,92,93,94].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Azab, S. N., & Ashour, H.
Affiliations
Beni-Suef University (EG)
Corresponding author
Azab, Safinaz Nagib
Venue
International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
79
Issue
1
Pages
36-41
ISSN
0165-5876 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036892025
Cited by
1
References
27
Citations by year
2021: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
specific language impairment, prosody, dysprosody, Arabic-speaking children, language development, speech therapy, children aged 4-6 years
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Egypt, Female, Humans, Language Development Disorders, Language Tests, Male, Phonetics, Speech Articulation Tests, Speech Disorders, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review