CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 165Construction Project Management and PerformanceResource-Constrained Project SchedulingCapital Investment and Risk Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A new approach for project control under uncertainty. Going back to the basics

Acebes, Fernando, Pajares, Javier, Galán, José Manuel, López-Paredes, Adolfo·2014·International Journal of Project Management
DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.08.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.08.003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Abba, 2010, Integrating technical performance measurement with earned value management, Meas. News, 4, 6
  2. Acebes, 2013, Beyond earned value management: a graphical framework for integrated cost, schedule and risk monitoring, Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., 74, 181, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.03.027 · DOI
  3. Aliverdi, 2013, Monitoring project duration and cost in a construction project by applying statistical quality control charts, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 31, 411, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.08.005 · DOI
  4. Al-Jibouri, 2003, Monitoring systems and their effectiveness for project cost control in construction, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 21, 145, 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00010-8 · DOI
  5. Anbari, 2003, Earned value project management method and extensions, Proj. Manag. J., 34, 12, 10.1177/875697280303400403 · DOI
  6. Barraza, 2007, Probabilistic control of project performance using control limit curves, J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 133, 957, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:12(957) · DOI
  7. Barraza, 2004, Probabilistic forecasting of project performance using stochastic S curves, J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 130, 25, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:1(25) · DOI
  8. Blanco, 2013, Earned value management: a predictive analysis tool, Nav. Supply Corps Newsl., 66, 24
  9. Chen, 2012, An analytic review of earned value management studies in the construction industry, 236
  10. Cioffi, 2006, Designing project management: a scientific notation and an improved formalism for earned value calculations, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 24, 136, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.07.003 · DOI
  11. Fazar, 1959, Program evaluation and review technique, Am. Stat., 13, 10
  12. Gowan, 2006, Earned value management in a data warehouse project, Inf. Manage. Comput. Secur., 14, 37, 10.1108/09685220610648364 · DOI
  13. Hanna, 2012, Using the earned value management system to improve electrical project control, J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 138, 449, 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000426 · DOI
  14. Hazir, 2011, Effects of the information presentation format on project control, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 62, 2157, 10.1057/jors.2011.11 · DOI
  15. Henderson, 2003, Earned schedule: a breakthrough extension to earned value theory? A retrospective analysis of real project data, The Measurable News, 1
  16. Henderson, 2004, Further developments in earned schedule, Meas. News, 15–22
  17. Jacob, 2003, Forecasting project schedule completion with earned value metrics, Meas. News, 7–9
  18. Jacob, 2004, Forecasting schedule completion using earned value metrics revisited, Meas. News, 11–17
  19. Kelley, 1961, Critical path planning and scheduling: mathematical basis, Oper. Res., 9, 296, 10.1287/opre.9.3.296 · DOI
  20. Kelley, 1989, The origins of CPM: a personal history, Proj. Manag. Netw., 3, 7
  21. Kim, 2003, A model for effective implementation of earned value management methodology, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 21, 375, 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00049-2 · DOI
  22. Klingel, 1966, Bias in pert project completion time calculations for a real network, Manag. Sci., 13, B194, 10.1287/mnsc.13.4.B194 · DOI
  23. Kwak, 2012, History, practices, and future of earned value management in government: perspectives from NASA, Proj. Manag. J., 43, 77, 10.1002/pmj.20272 · DOI
  24. Lambrechts, 2008, Proactive and reactive strategies for resource-constrained project scheduling with uncertain resource availabilities, J. Sched., 11, 121, 10.1007/s10951-007-0021-0 · DOI
  25. Leu, 2008, Project performance evaluation based on statistical process control techniques, J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 134, 813, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:10(813) · DOI
  26. Lipke, 1999, Applying management reserve to software project management, J. Def. Softw. Eng., 17–21
  27. Lipke, 2003, Schedule is different, Meas. News, 3, 31
  28. Lipke, 2004, Connecting earned value to the schedule, Meas. News, 1, 6
  29. Lipke, 2004, The probability of success, J. Qual. Assur. Inst., 14–21
  30. MacCrimmon, 1964, An analytical study of the PERT assumptions, Oper. Res., 12, 16, 10.1287/opre.12.1.16 · DOI
  31. Malcolm, 1959, Application of a technique for research and development program evaluation, Oper. Res., 7, 646, 10.1287/opre.7.5.646 · DOI
  32. McKim, 2000, Project performance control in reconstruction projects, J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 126, 137, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:2(137) · DOI
  33. Naderpour, 2011, Improving construction management of an educational center by applying earned value technique, Proc. Eng., 14, 1945, 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.244 · DOI
  34. Naeni, 2011, A fuzzy approach for the earned value management, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 29, 764, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.07.012 · DOI
  35. Navon, 2005, Automated project performance control of construction projects, Autom. Constr., 14, 467, 10.1016/j.autcon.2004.09.006 · DOI
  36. Pajares, 2011, An extension of the EVM analysis for project monitoring: the cost control index and the schedule control index, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 29, 615, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.04.005 · DOI
  37. Pontrandolfo, 2000, Project duration in stochastic networks by the PERT-path technique, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 18, 215, 10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00015-0 · DOI
  38. Schonberger, 1981, Why projects are “always” late: a rationale based on manual simulation of a PERT/CPM network, Interfaces, 11, 66, 10.1287/inte.11.5.66 · DOI
  39. Vanhoucke, 2011, On the dynamic use of project performance and schedule risk information during project tracking, Omega, 39, 416, 10.1016/j.omega.2010.09.006 · DOI
  40. Vanhoucke, 2012, Measuring the efficiency of project control using fictitious and empirical project data, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 30, 252, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.05.006 · DOI
  41. Vanhoucke, 2007, A simulation and evaluation of earned value metrics to forecast the project duration, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 58, 1361, 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602296 · DOI
  42. Warburton, 2011, A time-dependent earned value model for software projects, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 29, 1082, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.02.008 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Acebes, F., Pajares, J., Galán, J. M., & López-Paredes, A.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Valladolid (ES)
  • Universidad de Burgos (ES)
Corresponding author
Pajares, Javier
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Project Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
423-434
ISSN
0263-7863 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.08.003
OpenAlex
W2033098432
Cited by
165
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 5
FWCI
14.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Project Management (publishedVersion)
  • University of Valladolid Documentary Repository (University of Valladolid) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
Keywords
earned value management, project risk analysis, project simulation, activity variability, PERT

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review