The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explicating the dynamics of project capabilities
Open accessAbstract
This article provides a foundation to guide future research on project capabilities based on three main contributions. First, drawing upon research on dynamic capabilities and organisational ambidexterity, we suggest that innovative and routine dimensions of project capabilities are developed and mobilised to deal with the variety of exploratory and exploitative conditions facing an organisation. Second, we distinguish between project capabilities at the operational and dynamic capabilities at the strategic levels, arguing that firms depend on identifiable dynamic capabilities (e.g. portfolio management techniques) to know when and how to maintain current project capabilities and when to modify or replace them depending on the conditions encountered. Third, we suggest that the relationship between dynamic and project capabilities is reciprocal, recursive and mutually reinforcing. In this reciprocal relationship, the emergence of new or declining project capabilities provides indications for the strategic priorities, behaviours and future deployment of an organisation's dynamic capabilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131009 · Cited by 6,477
Understanding dynamic capabilities
Winter, S. G. (2003) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.318 · Cited by 5,315
The dynamic resource‐based view: capability lifecycles
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.332 · Cited by 4,553
Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393701 · Cited by 2,426
Organizational Capabilities and the Economic History of the Industrial Enterprise
Chandler, A. D. (1992) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.6.3.79 · Cited by 847 · cited 3×
“…help firms achieve competitive advantage by modifying or creating new lower-level operational capabilities and routines to address changing environmental conditions (Nelson and Winter, 1982; Chandler, 1992; Teece et al, 1997; Zollo and Winter, 2002; Helfat and Peteraf, 2003; Teece, 2007 & 2010).”
BackgroundLost Roots: How Project Management Came to Emphasize Control over Flexibility and Novelty
Lenfle, S., & Loch, C. (2010) · California Management Review · doi:10.1525/cmr.2010.53.1.32 · Cited by 348
Cited by
Schilke, O., Hu, S., & Helfat, C. E. (2018) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0014 · Cited by 1,226
Organizational Capabilities and the Economic History of the Industrial Enterprise
Chandler, A. D. (1992) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.6.3.79 · Cited by 847
A routine dynamics lens on the stability-change dilemma in project-based organizations
Bygballe, L. E., Swärd, A., & Vaagaasar, A. L. (2021) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1177/8756972820986660 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Davies, A., & Brady, T.
- Venue
- International Journal of Project Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-02
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 314-327
- ISSN
- 0263-7863 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1771843501
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 46.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
