Cited by 20

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Routine Dynamics Lens on the Stability-Change Dilemma in Project-Based Organizations

Bygballe, Lena E., Swärd, Anna, Vaagaasar, Anne Live·2021·Project Management Journal

Abstract

A central issue in project-based organizations (PBOs) is how to balance the need for flexibly responding to changing customer demands and creating consistent performance in the organization at large. This article discusses the relevance of a routine dynamics lens for understanding this dilemma. We show how routine dynamics might help to understand how and under what conditions routines—with their dual capacity for stability and change—produce a variety of performances, some stable and some varying, in the PBO. As such, we contribute to the stream of research that seeks to explain how PBOs build capabilities and how they work.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/8756972820986660

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The findings show that a clear distinction between control and flexibility can be detected in the discussion in the group interviews.

    “Adding to the ongoing discussion on how to balance flexibility and control in projects (Bygballe et al., 2021; Sydow and Windeler, 2020), the findings show that a clear distinction between control and flexibility can be detected in the dis­ cussion in the group interviews.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. Addyman S. (2019). The timing of patterning or the patterning of timing? Organisational routines in temporary organisations [Doctoral thesis PhD]. University College London UCL.
  2. Argyris C. (1977). Double loop learning in organizations. Harvard Business Review, 55(5), 115–125.
  3. 10.1177/0170840616655982 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.lrp.2018.03.006 · DOI
  5. 10.1287/orsc.1070.0248 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/0170840604048002 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/0170840604047999 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/875697280503600304 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/8756972818820213 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/oso/9780198870715.003.0008 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.006 · DOI
  12. Cyert R. M., March J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice Hall.
  13. 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.012 · DOI
  14. 10.1287/orsc.2014.0913 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00113-X · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.04.006 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/875697281604700502 · DOI
  18. Dewey J. (1925, 1958) Experience and nature. Dover Publications.
  19. 10.5465/amr.2011.0215 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/0170840608094775 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/01446190210163543 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.2307/3094828 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00088-4 · DOI
  24. 10.5130/AJCEB.v15i3.4601 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/0018726708096640 · DOI
  26. 10.5465/AMR.2010.48463331 · DOI
  27. 10.1287/orsc.11.6.611.12529 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1093/icc/12.4.727 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198759485.003.0002 · DOI
  30. 10.1287/orsc.2016.1070 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/1467-6486.00294 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00114-1 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.06.004 · DOI
  34. 10.5465/amj.2006.22083026 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.01.003 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695072.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00110-4 · DOI
  38. 10.1287/orsc.1050.0150 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.4135/9781473957954.n20 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198759485.001.0001 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198759485.003.0006 · DOI
  42. 10.1287/orsc.1110.0693 · DOI
  43. 10.5465/amj.2013.4001 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.010 · DOI
  45. 10.1002/smj.4250141009 · DOI
  46. 10.1023/B:MAGO.0000015392.75507.ad · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.005 · DOI
  48. March J. G., Simon H. A. (1958). Organizations. John Wiley.
  49. Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press.
  50. 10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.5465/19416520.2011.589143 · DOI
  52. 10.1111/1467-9566.12449 · DOI
  53. 10.1080/09537325.2018.1459538 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2008.08.001 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01064.x · DOI
  56. 10.2307/2393300 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00157-3 · DOI
  58. 10.1177/1350508404039660 · DOI
  59. 10.1177/0149206310371691 · DOI
  60. 10.1177/0001839217707738 · DOI
  61. 10.1287/orsc.2015.1031 · DOI
  62. 10.1177/8756972819896482 · DOI
  63. Shenhar A. J., Dvir D. (2007). Reinventing project management: The diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Harvard Business Review Press.
  64. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198759485.003.0003 · DOI
  65. 10.4135/9781446280669.n15 · DOI
  66. 10.1108/S0742-3322(2011)0000028013 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.06.002 · DOI
  68. 10.1177/0170840604048162 · DOI
  69. 10.1111/joms.12219 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Turner S. F. (2014). The temporal dimension of routines and their outcomes: Exploring the role of time in the capabilities and practice perspectives. In Shipp A. J., Fried Y. (Eds.), In time and work: How time impacts groups, organizations and methodological choices (Vol. 2 , pp. 115–145). Psychology Press.
  71. 10.1287/orsc.1110.0653 · DOI
  72. 10.1093/icc/dtj003 · DOI
  73. 10.1177/0170840601226006 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bygballe, L. E., Swärd, A., & Vaagaasar, A. L.
Affiliations
  • Department of Strategy and Entrepreneurship, BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway
  • Department of Leadership and Organizational Behaviour, BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway
Venue
Project Management Journal
Published
2021-05-12
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
278-286
ISSN
  • 8756-9728
  • 1938-9507
Cited by
20
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review