The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Routine Dynamics Lens on the Stability-Change Dilemma in Project-Based Organizations
Abstract
A central issue in project-based organizations (PBOs) is how to balance the need for flexibly responding to changing customer demands and creating consistent performance in the organization at large. This article discusses the relevance of a routine dynamics lens for understanding this dilemma. We show how routine dynamics might help to understand how and under what conditions routines—with their dual capacity for stability and change—produce a variety of performances, some stable and some varying, in the PBO. As such, we contribute to the stream of research that seeks to explain how PBOs build capabilities and how they work.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The findings show that a clear distinction between control and flexibility can be detected in the discussion in the group interviews.
“Adding to the ongoing discussion on how to balance flexibility and control in projects (Bygballe et al., 2021; Sydow and Windeler, 2020), the findings show that a clear distinction between control and flexibility can be detected in the dis cussion in the group interviews.”
From Rethinking the project life cycle – how circularity challenges processes, roles and governance (2025) · cites this paper as Bygballe et al., 2021
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556620 · Cited by 4,020
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 73
- Addyman S. (2019). The timing of patterning or the patterning of timing? Organisational routines in temporary organisations [Doctoral thesis PhD]. University College London UCL.
- Argyris C. (1977). Double loop learning in organizations. Harvard Business Review, 55(5), 115–125.
- 10.1177/0170840616655982 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.lrp.2018.03.006 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1070.0248 · DOI
- 10.1177/0170840604048002 · DOI
- 10.1177/0170840604047999 · DOI
- 10.1177/875697280503600304 · DOI
- 10.1177/8756972818820213 · DOI
- 10.1093/oso/9780198870715.003.0008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.006 · DOI
- Cyert R. M., March J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice Hall.
- 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.012 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.2014.0913 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00113-X · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.04.006 · DOI
- 10.1177/875697281604700502 · DOI
- Dewey J. (1925, 1958) Experience and nature. Dover Publications.
- 10.5465/amr.2011.0215 · DOI
- 10.1177/0170840608094775 · DOI
- 10.1080/01446190210163543 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3094828 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00088-4 · DOI
- 10.5130/AJCEB.v15i3.4601 · DOI
- 10.1177/0018726708096640 · DOI
- 10.5465/AMR.2010.48463331 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.11.6.611.12529 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/icc/12.4.727 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198759485.003.0002 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.2016.1070 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-6486.00294 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00114-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.06.004 · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2006.22083026 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.01.003 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695072.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00110-4 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1050.0150 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4135/9781473957954.n20 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198759485.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198759485.003.0006 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1110.0693 · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2013.4001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.010 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.4250141009 · DOI
- 10.1023/B:MAGO.0000015392.75507.ad · DOI
- 10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.005 · DOI
- March J. G., Simon H. A. (1958). Organizations. John Wiley.
- Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press.
- 10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/19416520.2011.589143 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9566.12449 · DOI
- 10.1080/09537325.2018.1459538 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2008.08.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01064.x · DOI
- 10.2307/2393300 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00157-3 · DOI
- 10.1177/1350508404039660 · DOI
- 10.1177/0149206310371691 · DOI
- 10.1177/0001839217707738 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.2015.1031 · DOI
- 10.1177/8756972819896482 · DOI
- Shenhar A. J., Dvir D. (2007). Reinventing project management: The diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Harvard Business Review Press.
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198759485.003.0003 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781446280669.n15 · DOI
- 10.1108/S0742-3322(2011)0000028013 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.06.002 · DOI
- 10.1177/0170840604048162 · DOI
- 10.1111/joms.12219 · DOI · Paper page
- Turner S. F. (2014). The temporal dimension of routines and their outcomes: Exploring the role of time in the capabilities and practice perspectives. In Shipp A. J., Fried Y. (Eds.), In time and work: How time impacts groups, organizations and methodological choices (Vol. 2 , pp. 115–145). Psychology Press.
- 10.1287/orsc.1110.0653 · DOI
- 10.1093/icc/dtj003 · DOI
- 10.1177/0170840601226006 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rethinking the project life cycle – how circularity challenges processes, roles and governance
Lingegård, S., & Hedborg, S. (2025) · Project Leadership and Society · doi:10.1016/j.plas.2025.100194 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Bygballe, L. E., Swärd, A., & Vaagaasar, A. L.
- Affiliations
- Department of Strategy and Entrepreneurship, BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Leadership and Organizational Behaviour, BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway
- Venue
- Project Management Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-05-12
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 278-286
- ISSN
- 8756-9728
- 1938-9507
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review