Cited by 78Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesEmotions and Moral BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Attentional bias to negative emotion as a function of approach and withdrawal anger styles: an ERP investigation.

Open access
Stewart, Jennifer L., Silton, Rebecca Levin, Sass, Sarah M., Fisher, Joscelyn E., Edgar, J. Christopher, Heller, Wendy, Miller, Gregory A.·2010·International Journal of Psychophysiology

Abstract

Although models of emotion have focused on the relationship between anger and approach motivation associated with aggression, anger is also related to withdrawal motivation. Anger-out and anger-in styles are associated with psychopathology and may disrupt the control of attention within the context of negatively valenced information. The present study used event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to examine whether anger styles uniquely predict attentional bias to negative stimuli during an emotion-word Stroop task. High anger-out predicted larger N200, P300, and N400 to negative words, suggesting that aggressive individuals exert more effort to override attention to negative information. In contrast, high anger-in predicted smaller N400 amplitude to negative words, indicating that negative information may be readily available (primed) for anger suppressors, requiring fewer resources. Individuals with an anger-out style might benefit from being directed away from provocative stimuli that might otherwise consume their attention and foster overt aggression. Findings indicating that anger-out and anger-in were associated with divergent patterns of brain activity provide support for distinguishing approach- and withdrawal-related anger styles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.01.008

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A block design could induce a specific emotion in a relatively short time.

    “Thus, we used a block design which could induce a specific emotion in a relatively short time (Stewart et al., 2010).”

    From Repetitive Religious Chanting Modulates the Late-Stage Brain Response to Fear- and Stress-Provoking Pictures (2017) · cites this paper as Stewart et al., 2010

    The Method (Stimuli and Experimental Design; page unavailable) describes short blocks of positive or negative emotion words and says blocked presentation is more effective than intermixed presentation at eliciting emotion-word Stroop interference. It does not show that the blocks induced a specific emotion in participants; Stroop interference is a different outcome. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Algom D Chajut E Shlomo L A rational look at the emotional Stroop phenomenon: A generic slowdown, not a Stroop effect Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004 133 323 338 15355142
  2. Averill JR Parrott WG Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion Emotions in social psychology: Essential readings 2001 Philadelphia Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis 337 352
  3. Barratt ES Stanford MS Kent TA Felthous A Neuropsychological and cognitive psychophysiological substrates of impulsive aggression Biological Psychiatry 1997 41 1045 1061 9129785
  4. Berg P Scherg M Use of prior knowledge in brain electromagnetic source analysis Brain Topography 1991 4 143 150 1793688
  5. Berg P Scherg M A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology 1994 90 229 241 7511504
  6. Berkowitz L On the formulation and regulation of anger and aggression: A cognitive-neoassociationistic analysis American Psychologist 1990 45 494 503 2186678
  7. Bernat EM Hall JR Steffen BV Patrick CJ Violent offending predicts P300 amplitude Int. J. Psychophysiol 2007 66 161 167 17555836 PMC2219466
  8. Carver CS Harmon-Jones E Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications Psychological Bulletin 2009 135 183 204 19254075
  9. Coles MGH Gratton G Fabiani M Cacioppo J Tassinary L Event related brain potentials Principles of psychophysiology: Physical, social, and inferential elements 2000 NY Cambridge University Press 413 455
  10. Compton RJ Banich MT Mohanty A Milham MP Miller GA Scalf P Paying attention to emotion: A fMRI investigation of cognitive and emotional Stroop tasks Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience 2003 3 81 93 12943324
  11. Cook EW Miller GA Digital filtering: Background and tutorial for psychophysiologists Psychophysiology 1992 29 350 367 1626044
  12. Curtin JJ Fairchild BA Alcohol and cognitive control: Implications for regulation of behavior during response conflict Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2003 112 424 436 12943021
  13. Deffenbacher JL Oetting ER Lynch RS Morris CD The expression of anger and its consequences Behaviour Research & Therapy 1996 34 575 590 8826765
  14. Edgar JC Stewart JL Miller GA Handy TC Digital filtering in EEG/ERP research Event-related potentials: A handbook 2005 Cambridge, MA MIT Press 85 113
  15. Franken IHA Gootjes L van Strien JW Automatic processing of emotional words during an emotional Stroop task NeuroReport 2009 20 776 781 19369909
  16. Gerstle JE Mathias CW Stanford MS Auditory P300 and self-reported impulsive aggression Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry 1998 22 575 583 9682274
  17. Hillyard SA Hink RF Schwent VL Picton TW Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain Science 1973 182 177 180 4730062
  18. Hillyard SA Teder-Salejarvi WA Munte TF Temporal dynamics of early perceptual processing Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1998 8 202 210 9635203
  19. Junghöfer M Bradley MM Elbert TR Lang PJ Fleeting images: A new look at early emotion discrimination Psychophysiology 2001 38 175 178 11347862
  20. Kanske P Kotz SA Concreteness in emotional words: ERP evidence from a hemifield study Brain Research 2007 1148 138 148 17391654
  21. Kutas M Hillyard SA Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity Science 1980 207 203 205 7350657
  22. Liotti M Woldorff MG Perez R Mayberg HS An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect Neuropsychologia 2000 38 701 711 10689046
  23. Mathias CW Stanford MS P300 under standard and surprise conditions in selfreported impulsive aggression Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry 1999 23 1037 1051 10621948
  24. Nätäänen R Simpson M Loveless NE Stimulus deviance and evoked potentials Biological Psychology 1982 14 53 98 7104425
  25. Oldfield OC The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory Neuropsychologia 1971 9 97 113 5146491
  26. Patrick CJ Verona E Flannery D Vazsonyi A Waldman I The psychophysiology of aggression: Autonomic, electrocortical, and neuroimaging findings The Cambridge handbook of violent behavior and aggression 2007 NY Cambridge University Press 111 150
  27. Perez-Edgar K Fox NA Individual differences in children’s performance during an emotional Stroop task: A behavioral and electrophysiological study Brain and Cognition 2003 52 33 51 12812803
  28. Perrin F Pernier J Bertrand O Echallier JF Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1989 72 184 187 2464490
  29. Rebai M Bernard C Lannou J The Stroop’s test evokes a negative brain potential, the N400 International Journal of Neuroscience 1997 91 85 94 9394217
  30. Sass SM Heller W Stewart JL Silton RL Edgar JC Fisher JE Time course of attentional bias in anxiety: Emotion and gender specificity Psychophysiology in press PMC3073148 19863758
  31. Schirmer A Kotz SA Friederici AD Sex differentiates the role of emotional prosody during word processing Cognitive Brain Research 2002 14 228 233 12067695
  32. Schirmer A Kotz SA Friederici AD On the role of attention for the processing of emotions in speech: Sex differences revisited Cognitive Brain Research 2005 24 442 452 16099357
  33. Smith P Waterman M Role of experience in processing bias for aggressive words in forensic and non-forensic populations Aggressive Behavior 2004 30 105 122
  34. Stewart JL Levin-Silton R Sass SM Heller W Miller GA Anger style, psychopathology, and regional brain activity Emotion 2008 8 701 713 18837620 PMC3047003
  35. Strik WK Fallgatter AJ Brandeis D Pascual-Marqui RD Three-dimensional tomography of event-related potentials during response inhibition: Evidence for phasic frontal lobe activation Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1998 108 406 413 9714383
  36. van Petten C Kutas M Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials Memory and Cognition 1990 18 380 393 2381317
  37. van Veen V Carter CS The timing of action monitoring processes in anterior cingulate cortex Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2002 14 593 602 12126500
  38. Watson D Locating anger in the hierarchical structure of affect: Comment on Carver and Harmon-Jones Psychological Bulletin 2009 135 205 208 19254076
  39. Watson D Clark LA Weber K Assenheimer JS Strauss ME McCormick RA Testing a tripartite model: II. Exploring the symptom structure of anxiety and depression in student, adult, and patient samples Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1995 104 15 25 7897037
  40. Wenzel A Lystad C Interpretation biases in angry and anxious individuals Behaviour Research and Therapy 2005 43 1045 1054 15967175

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stewart, J. L., Silton, R. L., Sass, S. M., Fisher, J. E., Edgar, J. C., Heller, W., & Miller, G. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Seattle Children's Hospital (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
Corresponding author
Stewart, Jennifer L.
Venue
International Journal of Psychophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
76
Issue
1
Pages
9-18
ISSN
0167-8760 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049459753
Cited by
78
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH-61358, P50MH079485, T32MH019554, T32 MH-19554, R01MH061358)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA014111, R21 DA 14111)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
attentional bias, negative emotions, anger-out, anger-in, approach motivation, N400, P300, N2 component, emotion regulation, aggression
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Anger, Attention, Brain, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reaction Time, Visual Perception, Vocabulary, Bias, Expressed Emotion, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review