Cited by 6Refrigeration and Air Conditioning TechnologiesHeat Transfer and OptimizationAdsorption and Cooling Systems

Dynamic behavior of a direct expansion evaporator under frosting condition. Part II. Field investigation on a shipping container

Tso, C.P., Cheng, Y.C., Lai, A.C.K.·2006·International Journal of Refrigeration

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2005.09.012

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tso, C. P., Cheng, Y. C., & Lai, A. C. K.
Affiliations
  • Multimedia University (MY)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Venue
International Journal of Refrigeration
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-06
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
624-631
ISSN
0140-7007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079924475
Cited by
6
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Refrigeration (publishedVersion)
  • Siti Hasmah Digital Library-MMU Institutiona Repository (Multimedia University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Adsorption and Cooling Systems
Keywords
frost formation, refrigerated containers, R12 refrigerant, fieldwork, numerical model validation, outlet air temperature, air pressure drop, heat transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review