Higher-than-conventional radiation doses in localized prostate cancer treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials
Abstract
Purpose To determine in a meta-analysis whether the outcomes in men with localized prostate cancer treated with high-dose radiotherapy (HDRT) are better than those in men treated with conventional-dose radiotherapy (CDRT), by quantifying the effect of the total dose of radiotherapy on biochemical control (BC).Methods and materials The MEDLINE, EMBASE, CANCERLIT, and Cochrane Library databases, as well as the proceedings of annual meetings, were systematically searched to identify randomized, controlled studies comparing HDRT with CDRT for localized prostate cancer. To evaluate the dose-response relationship, we conducted a meta-regression analysis of BC ratios by means of weighted linear regression.Results Seven RCTs with a total patient population of 2812 were identified that met the study criteria. Pooled results from these RCTs showed a significant reduction in the incidence of biochemical failure in those patients with prostate cancer treated with HDRT (p < 0.0001). However, there was no difference in the mortality rate (p = 0.38) and specific prostate cancer mortality rates (p = 0.45) between the groups receiving HDRT and CDRT. However, there were more cases of late Grade >2 gastrointestinal toxicity after HDRT than after CDRT. In the subgroup analysis, patients classified as being at low (p = 0.007), intermediate (p < 0.0001), and high risk (p < 0.0001) of biochemical failure all showed a benefit from HDRT. The meta-regression analysis also detected a linear correlation between the total dose of radiotherapy and biochemical failure (BC = -67.3 + [1.8 x radiotherapy total dose in Gy]; p = 0.04).Conclusions Our meta-analysis showed that HDRT is superior to CDRT in preventing biochemical failure in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer patients, suggesting that this should be offered as a treatment for all patients, regardless of their risk status.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Advances in radiation oncology have improved outcomes in a number of different cancers.
“This has resulted in improved outcomes in a number of different cancers (2, 342–350).”
From Adrenocortical carcinoma (2014) · cites this paper as [2]
Cites
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722 · see citing works
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552 · see citing works
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955 · see citing works
The combination of estimates from different experiments
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001666 · Cited by 5,380 · see citing works
Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M. D. Anderson phase III randomized trial
Pollack, A. S., Zagars, G. K., Starkschall, G., et al. (2002) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02829-8 · Cited by 1,339 · see citing works
Long-term results of the M.D. Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer
Kuban, D. A., Tucker, S. L., Dong, L., Starkschall, G., Huang, E. H., Cheung, M. R., Lee, A. K., & Pollack, A. (2008) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.054 · Cited by 1,232 · see citing works
Zietman, A. L., DeSilvio, M. L., Slater, J. D., Rossi, C. J., Miller, D. W., Adams, J. A., & Shipley, W. U. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.10.1233 · Cited by 1,224 · see citing works
Peeters, S., Heemsbergen, W. D., Koper, P. C. M., et al. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.05.2530 · Cited by 969 · see citing works
Zeléfsky, M. J., Leibel, S., Gaudin, P. B., Kutcher, G. J., Fleshner, N. E., Venkatramen, E. S., Reuter, V., Fair, W. R., Ling, C., & FUKS, Z. Y. (1998) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00091-1 · Cited by 920 · see citing works
Dearnaley, D. P., Sydes, M. R., Graham, J. D., Aird, E. G. A., Bottomley, D., Cowan, R. A., Huddart, R. A., Jose, C. C., Matthews, J. H. L., Millar, J. L., et al. (2007) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(07)70143-2 · Cited by 904 · see citing works
Zeléfsky, M. J., FUKS, Z. Y., Hunt, M. A., Yamada, Y. J., Marion, C., Ling, C., Amols, H., Venkatraman, E. S., & Leibel, S. A. (2002) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02857-2 · Cited by 774 · see citing works
Zeléfsky, M. J., FUKS, Z. Y., Hunt, M. A., LEE, H. J., Lombardi, D., Ling, C. C., Reuter, V. E., Venkatraman, E. S., & Leibel, S. A. (2001) · The Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65855-7 · Cited by 696 · see citing works
Zeléfsky, M. J., Chan, H. M., Hunt, M. A., et al. (2006) · The Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.002 · Cited by 469 · see citing works
Shipley, W. U., Verhey, L., Munzenrider, J. E., et al. (1995) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(95)00063-5 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Sathya, J., Davis, I. R., Julian, J. A., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.06.154 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
D'Amico, A. V., Whittington, R., Malkowicz, S. B., Fondurulia, J., Chen, M., Kaplan, I. D., Beard, C. J., Tomaszewski, J. E., Renshaw, A. A., Wein, A. J., et al. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1999.17.1.168 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Analysing and Presenting Results
Macaskill, P., Gatsonis, C., Deeks, J. J., Harbord, R., & Takwoingi, Y. (2010) · Bristol Research (University of Bristol) · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Kuban, D. A., Thames, H. D., Levy, L. B., et al. (2003) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00632-1 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Nutting, C. M., Convery, D. J., Cosgrove, V. P., et al. (2000) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00653-2 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Prostate Specific Antigen after External Beam Radiotherapy for Prostatic Cancer: Followup
Kaplan, I., Cox, R. S., & Bagshaw, M. A. (1993) · The Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36133-5 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Dose selection for prostate cancer patients based on dose comparison and dose response studies
Hanks, G. E., Hanlon, A. L., Pinover, W. H., et al. (2000) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00498-8 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Valicenti, R. K., Lu, J., Pilepich, M. V., et al. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2000.18.14.2740 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
The treatment of prostate cancer by conventional radiation therapy: An analysis of long-term outcome
Zietman, A. L., Coen, J. J., Dallow, K. C., et al. (1995) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(95)00123-g · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy Dose Response: An Update of the Fox Chase Experience
Pollack, A. S., Hanlon, A. L., Horwitz, E. M., et al. (2004) · The Journal of Urology · doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000111844.95024.74 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Beckendorf, V., Guerif, S. G., Prisé, É. L., et al. (2004) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.033 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Kupelian, P. A., Mohan, D. S., Lyons, J. A., et al. (2000) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00455-1 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Morris, D. E., Emami, B., Mauch, P., et al. (2005) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.666 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Horwitz, E. M., Vicini, F. A., Ziaja, E. L., et al. (1996) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00360-4 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Kupelian, P. A., Buchsbaum, J. C., Reddy, C. A., et al. (2001) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01466-3 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Defining a dose–response relationship with radiotherapy for prostate cancer: is more really better?
Vicini, F. A., Abner, A. L., Baglan, K. L., et al. (2001) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01799-0 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Schellhammer, P. F. (1998) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00090-x · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Integrating hormonal therapy with external-beam radiation and brachytherapy for prostate cancer.
Andrews, J. R., & Roach, M. (2005) · PubMed · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Sathya, J., Davis, L., Julien, J., et al. (2005) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/s0167-8140(05)80175-6 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Else, T., Kim, A. C., Sabolch, A., Raymond, V. M., Kandathil, A., Caoili, E. M., Jolly, S., Miller, B. S., Giordano, T. J., & Hammer, G. D. (2014) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2013-1029 · Cited by 892 · see citing works
Exploiting biological and physical determinants of radiotherapy toxicity to individualize treatment
Scaife, J. E., Barnett, G. C., Noble, D. J., Jena, R., Thomas, S. J., West, C. M. L., & Burnet, N. G. (2015) · The British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr.20150172 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
- Authors
- Viani, G. A., Stefano, E. J., & Afonso, S. L.
- Affiliations
- Faculdade de Medicina de Marília (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Viani, Gustavo Arruda
- Venue
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1405-1418
- ISSN
- 0360-3016 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165244734
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 37
- FWCI
- 4.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Keywords
- localized prostate cancer, high-dose radiotherapy, biochemical recurrence, prostate cancer mortality, late gastrointestinal toxicity, risk stratification, radiotherapy toxicity
- MeSH terms
- Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Humans, Male, Prostatic Neoplasms, Regression Analysis, Survival Rate, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Prostate-Specific Antigen
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review