The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of RTOG Consensus Guidelines for the Definition of the Clinical Target Volume for Postoperative Conformal Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Purpose To define a prostate fossa clinical target volume (PF-CTV0 for Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials utilizing post-operative radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Methods and Materials An RTOG sponsored meeting was held to define an appropriate PF-CTV after radical prostatectomy. Data was presented describing radiographic failure patterns after surgery. Target volumes used in previous trials were reviewed. Using contours independently submitted by 13 radiation oncologists, a statistical imputation method derived a preliminary “consensus” PF-CTV. Results Starting from the model derived CTV, consensus was reached for a CT image-based PF-CTV. The PF-CTV should extend superiorly from the level of the caudal vas deferens remnant to > 8-12mm inferior to vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA). Below the superior border of the pubic symphysis, the anterior border extends to the posterior aspect of the pubis and posteriorly to the rectum where it may be concave at the level of the VUA. At this level the lateral border extends to the levator ani. Above the pubic symphysis the anterior border should encompass the posterior 1-2cm of the bladder wall and posteriorly it is bounded by the mesorectal fascia. At this level the lateral border is the sacrorectogenitopubic fascia. Seminal vesicle remnants, if present, should be included in the CTV if there is pathologic evidence of their involvement. Conclusions Consensus on postoperative PF-CTV for RT after prostatectomy was reached and is available as a CT image atlas on the RTOG website. This will allow uniformity in defining PF-CTV for clinical trials that include post-prostatectomy RT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions.
Everitt, B. S., & Fleiss, J. L. (1981) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530193 · Cited by 8,990
Warfield, S. K., Zou, K. H., & Wells, W. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2004.828354 · Cited by 2,072
Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Pathologically Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Thompson, I. M., Tangen, C. M., Paradelo, J., Lucia, M. S., Miller, G., Troyer, D., Messing, E., Forman, J., Chin, J., Swanson, G., et al. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.19.2329 · Cited by 897
Stephenson, A. J., Scardino, P. T., Kattan, M. W., Pisansky, T. M., Slawin, K. M., Klein, E. A., Anscher, M. S., Michalski, J. M., Sandler, H. M., Lin, D. W., et al. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.08.9607 · Cited by 888
Self-citationCERR: A computational environment for radiotherapy research
Deasy, J. O., Blanco, A. I., & Clark, V. H. (2003) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.1568978 · Cited by 872
Trock, B. J. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.299.23.2760 · Cited by 657
Valicenti, R. K., Gomella, L. G., Ismail, M., Mulholland, S. G., Petersen, R. O., & Corn, B. W. (1998) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00270-3 · Cited by 94
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Michalski, J. M., Lawton, C., El Naqa, I., Ritter, M., O'Meara, E., Seider, M. J., Lee, W. R., Rosenthal, S. A., Pisansky, T., Catton, C., Valicenti, R. K., Zietman, A. L., Bosch, W. R., Sandler, H., Buyyounouski, M. K., & Ménard, C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 361-368
- ISSN
- 0360-3016 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036220888
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 13.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of RTOG Consensus Guidelines for the Definition of the Clinical Target Volume for Postoperative Conformal Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.006
- The paper
- Michalski, J. M., Lawton, C., El Naqa, I., Ritter, M., O'Meara, E., Seider, M. J., Lee, W. R., Rosenthal, S. A., Pisansky, T., Catton, C., Valicenti, R. K., Zietman, A. L., Bosch, W. R., Sandler, H., Buyyounouski, M. K., & Ménard, C. (2010). Development of RTOG Consensus Guidelines for the Definition of the Clinical Target Volume for Postoperative Conformal Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.