The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prostate Cancer–Specific Survival Following Salvage Radiotherapy vs Observation in Men With Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Biochemical disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy often prompts salvage radiotherapy, but no studies to date have had sufficient numbers of patients or follow-up to determine whether radiotherapy improves survival, and if so, the subgroup of men most likely to benefit. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the relative improvement in prostate cancer-specific survival of salvage radiotherapy vs no therapy after biochemical recurrence following prostatectomy, and to identify subgroups for whom salvage treatment is most beneficial. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Retrospective analysis of a cohort of 635 US men undergoing prostatectomy from 1982-2004, followed up through December 28, 2007, who experienced biochemical and/or local recurrence and received no salvage treatment (n = 397), salvage radiotherapy alone (n = 160), or salvage radiotherapy combined with hormonal therapy (n = 78). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Prostate cancer-specific survival defined from time of recurrence until death from disease. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 6 years after recurrence and 9 years after prostatectomy, 116 men (18%) died from prostate cancer, including 89 (22%) who received no salvage treatment, 18 (11%) who received salvage radiotherapy alone, and 9 (12%) who received salvage radiotherapy and hormonal therapy. Salvage radiotherapy alone was associated with a significant 3-fold increase in prostate cancer-specific survival relative to those who received no salvage treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.32 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.19-0.54]; P<.001). Addition of hormonal therapy to salvage radiotherapy was not associated with any additional increase in prostate cancer-specific survival (HR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.17-0.69]; P = .003). The increase in prostate cancer-specific survival associated with salvage radiotherapy was limited to men with a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of less than 6 months and remained after adjustment for pathological stage and other established prognostic factors. Salvage radiotherapy initiated more than 2 years after recurrence provided no significant increase in prostate cancer-specific survival. Men whose prostate-specific antigen level never became undetectable after salvage radiotherapy did not experience a significant increase in prostate cancer-specific survival. Salvage radiotherapy also was associated with a significant increase in overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage radiotherapy administered within 2 years of biochemical recurrence was associated with a significant increase in prostate cancer-specific survival among men with a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of less than 6 months, independent of other prognostic features such as pathological stage or Gleason score. These preliminary findings should be validated in other settings, and ultimately, in a randomized controlled trial.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67887-7 · Cited by 5,127 · cited 1×
“Women without such high-risk features did not derive this same benefit from postmastectomy radiation, emphasizing the importance of identifying features predictive of response.(21-24) This study provides provocative evidence that even men with adverse prognostic features such as rapid PSA doubling time or high Gleason…”
Cited by
Rissin, D. M., Kan, C. W., Campbell, T. G., Howes, S. C., Fournier, D. R., Song, L., Piech, T., Patel, P. P., Chang, L., Rivnak, A. J., et al. (2010) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1641 · Cited by 2,119
Radiation with or without Antiandrogen Therapy in Recurrent Prostate Cancer
Shipley, W. U., Seiferheld, W., Lukka, H. R., Major, P. P., Heney, N. M., Grignon, D. J., Sartor, O., Patel, M. P., Bahary, J.-P., Zietman, A. L., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1607529 · Cited by 663
Van den Broeck, T., van den Bergh, R. C. N., Arfi, N., Gross, T., Moris, L., Briers, E., Cumberbatch, M., De Santis, M., Tilki, D., Fanti, S., et al. (2019) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.011 · Cited by 523
Positive Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Contemporary Update
Yossepowitch, O., Briganti, A., Eastham, J. A., Epstein, J., Graefen, M., Montironi, R., & Touijer, K. (2014) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.07.039 · Cited by 423
Michalski, J. M., Lawton, C., El Naqa, I., Ritter, M., O'Meara, E., Seider, M. J., Lee, W. R., Rosenthal, S. A., Pisansky, T., Catton, C., et al. (2010) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.006 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Trock, B. J.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2008-06-18
- Volume
- 299
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 2760
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2107671263
- Cited by
- 657
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 38.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prostate Cancer–Specific Survival Following Salvage Radiotherapy vs Observation in Men With Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.299.23.2760
- The paper
- Trock, B. J. (2008). Prostate Cancer–Specific Survival Following Salvage Radiotherapy vs Observation in Men With Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.23.2760
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.