The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of Normal Tissue Complication Probability Models in the Clinic
Open accessAbstract
The Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) review summarizes the currently available three-dimensional dose/volume/outcome data to update and refine the normal tissue dose/volume tolerance guidelines provided by the classic Emami et al. paper published in 1991. A "clinician's view" on using the QUANTEC information in a responsible manner is presented along with a description of the most commonly used normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. A summary of organ-specific dose/volume/outcome data, based on the QUANTEC reviews, is included.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A seminal paper by Emami et al. ( 6 ) summarized normal-tissue tolerances to external photon irradiation as they were known in 1991, and these data have been gradually updated and expanded through other initiatives such as Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) and Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic (HyTEC) ( 25 , 26 ).”
From Normal-Tissue Tolerance to Radiopharmaceutical Therapies, the Knowns and the Unknowns (2021) · cites this paper as [25]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation
Emami, B., Lyman, J., Brown, A., Cola, L., Goitein, M., Munzenrider, J. E., Shank, B., Solin, L. J., & Wesson, M. (1991) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(91)90171-y · Cited by 4,488
Trotti, A., Colevas, A. D., Setser, A., Rusch, V. W., Jaques, D. P., Budach, V., Langer, C. J., Murphy, B. A., Cumberlin, R. L., & Coleman, C. N. (2003) · Seminars in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1053-4296(03)00031-6 · Cited by 2,569
Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to an analytic function
Burman, C. M., Kutcher, G. J., Emami, B., & Goitein, M. (1991) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(91)90172-z · Cited by 1,251
Reporting and analyzing dose distributions: A concept of equivalent uniform dose
Niemierko, A. (1997) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.598063 · Cited by 1,231
Graham, M. V., Purdy, J. A., Emami, B., Harms, W. B., Bosch, W. R., Lockett, M. A., & Perez, C. A. (1999) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00183-2 · Cited by 1,221
Complication Probability as Assessed from Dose-Volume Histograms
Lyman, J. T. (1985) · Radiation Research · doi:10.2307/3576626 · Cited by 1,160
Kutcher, G. J., Burman, C. M., Brewster, L. J., Goitein, M., & Mohan, R. (1991) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(91)90173-2 · Cited by 560
Complication Probability as Assessed from Dose-Volume Histograms
Lyman, J. T. (1985) · Radiation Research Supplement · doi:10.2307/3583506 · Cited by 537
The Linear-Quadratic Model Is Inappropriate to Model High Dose per Fraction Effects in Radiosurgery
Kirkpatrick, J. P., Meyer, J. J., & Marks, L. B. (2008) · Seminars in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.semradonc.2008.04.005 · Cited by 519
Self-citationTreatment volume and tissue tolerance
Withers, H. R., Taylor, J. M. G., & Maciejewski, B. (1988) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(88)90098-3 · Cited by 446
Clinically relevant optimization of 3-D conformal treatments
Mohan, R., Mageras, G. S., Baldwin, B., Brewster, L. J., Kutcher, G. J., Leibel, S. A., Burman, C. M., Ling, C., & FUKS, Z. Y. (1992) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.596781 · Cited by 281
Analysis of clinical complication data for radiation hepatitis using a parallel architecture model
Jackson, A., Haken, R. K. T., ROBERTSON, J. M., Kessler, M. L., Kutcher, G. J., & Lawrence, T. S. (1995) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(94)00471-4 · Cited by 249
Self-citationNiemierko, A., & Goitein, M. (1991) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/0167-8140(91)90093-v · Cited by 231
Multivariable modeling of radiotherapy outcomes, including dose–volume and clinical factors
Naqa, I. E., Bradley, J. D., Blanco, A. I., Lindsay, P. E., Vićić, M., Hope, A. J., & Deasy, J. O. (2006) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.11.022 · Cited by 171
Self-citationEngels, B., Soete, G., Verellen, D., & Storme, G. A. (2008) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.007 · Cited by 162
Dyk, J. V., & Smathers, J. B. (2000) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.598908 · Cited by 162
Optimization of uncomplicated control for head and neck tumors
Ågren, A., Brahme, A., & Turesson, I. (1990) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(90)90037-k · Cited by 161
Meadows, A. T., Strong, L. C., Li, F. P., D’Angio, G. J., Schweisguth, O., Freeman, A. I., Jenkin, R. D. T., Jones, P. H. M., Nesbit, M. E., & For The Late Effects Study Group (1980) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19801215)46:12 · Cited by 108
Inter-tumor heterogeneity and radiation dose-control curves
Zagars, G. K., Schultheiss, T. E., & Peters, L. J. (1987) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/s0167-8140(87)80186-x · Cited by 92
Value of Whole Brain Re-irradiation for Brain Metastases — Single Centre Experience
Sadikov, E., Bezjak, A., Yi, Q.-L., Wells, W. A., Dawson, L. A., Millar, B.-A., & Laperrière, N. (2007) · Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.clon.2007.06.001 · Cited by 84
Orbital lymphoma: Is it necessary to treat the entire orbit?
Pfeffer, M. R., Rabin, T., Tsvang, L., Goffman, J., Rosen, N., & Symon, Z. (2004) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.03.039 · Cited by 78
Deasy, J. O., Niemierko, A., Herbert, D. E., Yan, D., Jackson, A., Haken, R. K. T., Langer, M., & Sapareto, S. (2002) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.1501473 · Cited by 69
Self-citationA Practical Guide to Intensity‐Modulated Radiation Therapy
Watanabe, Y. (2003) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.1600742 · Cited by 60
Modeling the effects of inhomogeneous dose distributions in normal tissues
Yorke, E. D. (2001) · Seminars in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1053/srao.2001.23478 · Cited by 53
Self-citationLate Effects of Cancer Treatment on Normal Tissues
Rubin, P. (2007) · Medical radiology · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-49070-8 · Cited by 50
Langer, M., Morrill, S. M., & Lane, R. (1998) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00057-1 · Cited by 39
Clinical experience with retreatment for palliation
Morris, D. E. (2000) · Seminars in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1053/s1053-4296(00)80039-9 · Cited by 35
Physician/patient-driven risk assignment in radiation oncology: Reality or fancy?
Amols, H. I., Zaider, M., Hayes, M. K., & Schiff, P. B. (1997) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00093-x · Cited by 19
Hope, A. J., Lindsay, P. E., Naqa, I. E., Bradley, J. D., Vivic, M., & Deasy, J. O. (2005) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.07.394 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Jolles, 1939, Area factor in skin reaction, Br Emp Cancer Campaign Rep, 16
- Niemierko, 1999, A generalized concept of equivalent uniform dose (EUD), Med Phys, 26, 1100
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stewart, F. A., Akleyev, A. V., Hauer-Jensen, M., Hendry, J. H., Kleiman, N. J., MacVittie, T. J., Aleman, B. M., Edgar, A. B., Mabuchi, K., Muirhead, C. R., et al. (2012) · Annals of the ICRP · doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2012.02.001 · Cited by 1,604
Chun, S. G., Hu, C., Choy, H., Komaki, R. U., Timmerman, R. D., Schild, S. E., Bogart, J. A., Dobelbower, M. C., Bosch, W. R., Galvin, J. M., et al. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2016.69.1378 · Cited by 747
“The lung V20 is a classic and the most frequently described dosimetric parameter believed to be a threshold dose that predicts probability of lung injury.(29) However, a number of retrospective analyses have correlated radiation pneumonitis with low-dose baths, such as the V5.”
BackgroundHanania, A. N., Mainwaring, W., Ghebre, Y. T., Hanania, N. A., & Ludwig, M. S. (2019) · CHEST Journal · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2019.03.033 · Cited by 645
Gay, H. A., Barthold, H. J., O’Meara, E., Bosch, W. R., Naqa, I. E., Al-Lozi, R., Rosenthal, S. A., Lawton, C. A., Lee, W. R., Sandler, H. M., et al. (2012) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.023 · Cited by 554
“Although the Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) effort provided updated normal tissue dose constraints for various organs, guidance regarding normal organ contouring was absent (5).”
MethodRadiation therapy‐associated toxicity: Etiology, management, and prevention
Wang, K., & Tepper, J. E. (2021) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21689 · Cited by 473
Metadata
- Authors
- Marks, L. B., Yorke, E. D., Jackson, A., Ten Haken, R. K., Constine, L. S., Eisbruch, A., Bentzen, S. M., Nam, J., & Deasy, J. O.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- University of Rochester Medicine (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Marks, Lawrence B.
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- S10-S19
- ISSN
- 0360-3016 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4041542
- OpenAlex
- W2046701188
- Cited by
- 1,826
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 92 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 125 · 2023: 132 · 2022: 130 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 138 · 2019: 146 · 2018: 164 · 2017: 122 · 2016: 108 · 2015: 102 · 2014: 112 · 2013: 87 · 2012: 55
- FWCI
- 56.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Lance Armstrong Foundation
- Armstrong Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (CA69579, R29CA069579, R29CA085181, R01CA069579, R01CA129182, R01CA085181, CA85181)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
- Keywords
- normal tissue complication probability, QUANTEC, normal tissue tolerance, NTCP models
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Child, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Humans, Models, Biological, Organ Specificity, Radiation Injuries, Radiation Tolerance, Models, Statistical, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Radiation Oncology, Dose Fractionation, Radiation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review