Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 729

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Bevacizumab Therapy for Radiation Necrosis of the Central Nervous System

Open access
Levin, Victor A., Bidaut, Luc, Hou, Ping, Kumar, Ashok J., Wefel, Jeffrey S., Bekele, B. Nebiyou, Prabhu, Sujit, Loghin, Monica, Gilbert, Mark R., Jackson, Edward F.·2011·International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics

Abstract

Purpose To conduct a controlled trial of bevacizumab for the treatment of symptomatic radiation necrosis of the brain. Methods and Materials Fourteen patients were entered into a placebo-controlled randomized double-blind study of bevacizumab for the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) radiation necrosis. All patients were required to have radiographic or biopsy proof of CNS radiation necrosis and progressive neurological symptoms or signs. Eligible patients received irradiation for head and neck carcinomas, meningioma, or low- to mid-grade gliomas. Patients were randomized to receive IV saline or bevacizumab at 3-week intervals. MRI 3-weeks after the second treatment and clinical signs and symptoms defined response or progression. Results The volumes of necrosis estimated on T2FLAIR and T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MRI demonstrated that, while no patient receiving placebo responded (0/7), all bevacizumab-treated patients did (5/5 randomized and 7/7 cross-over) with decreases in T2FLAIR and T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced volumes and decrease Ktrans. All bevacizumab-treated patients – and none of the placebo-treated patients - showed improvement in neurological symptoms or signs. At a median of 10 months after the last dose of bevacizumab in patients receiving all 4 study doses, only 2 patients had experienced a recurrence of MRI changes consistent with progressive radiation necrosis, and this was the only patient to receive only 2 treatments with bevacizumab. Conclusions This class I evidence of bevacizumab efficacy in the treatment of CNS radiation necrosis justifies consideration of this treatment option for people who suffer radiation necrosis secondary to the treatment of head and neck and brain cancers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.12.061

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 729

Metadata

Authors
Levin, V. A., Bidaut, L., Hou, P., Kumar, A. J., Wefel, J. S., Bekele, B. N., Prabhu, S., Loghin, M., Gilbert, M. R., & Jackson, E. F.
Venue
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
79
Issue
5
Pages
1487-1495
ISSN
0360-3016 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136963436
Cited by
729
References
0
FWCI
25.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Bevacizumab Therapy for Radiation Necrosis of the Central Nervous System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.12.061
The paper
Levin, V. A., Bidaut, L., Hou, P., Kumar, A. J., Wefel, J. S., Bekele, B. N., Prabhu, S., Loghin, M., Gilbert, M. R., & Jackson, E. F. (2011). Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Bevacizumab Therapy for Radiation Necrosis of the Central Nervous System. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.12.061

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.