Cited by 637Brain Metastases and TreatmentManagement of metastatic bone diseaseGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment

EANO-ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumours

Open access
Le Rhun, E., Weller, M., Brandsma, D., Van den Bent, M., de Azambuja, E., Henriksson, R., Boulanger, T., Peters, S. +5 more·2017·Annals of Oncology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annonc/mdx221

Cites

203 of 203 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intrathecal agents can cause a spectrum of toxicities ranging from myelosuppression to neurotoxicity.

    “Their use can cause a spectrum of toxicities ranging from myelosuppression to neurotoxicity.”

    From 5th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 5) (2020) · cites this paper as [101]

    The Intra-CSF pharmacotherapy section reports neurological complications with intrathecal methotrexate, and the Clinical Practice Guidelines section reports more neurotoxicity in an intra-CSF chemotherapy arm. The paper attributes haematological toxicity to high-dose systemic chemotherapy, not intrathecal treatment, so it does not support myelosuppression as part of the claimed intrathecal toxicity spectrum. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Retrospective data suggest some activity of different agents used systemically.

    “Retrospective data suggest some activity of different agents used systemically.100, 101, 102”
  • Three agents are commonly used for intrathecal treatment of leptomeningeal disease: methotrexate, cytarabine (including liposomal cytarabine) or thioTEPA.

    “Three agents are commonly used for intrathecal treatment of LMD: methotrexate, cytarabine (including liposomal cytarabine) or thioTEPA.100, 101, 102”

    From 5th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 5) (2020) · cites this paper as [101]

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [41]41. Gonzalez-Vitale JC, Garcia-Bunuel R. Meningeal carcinomatosis. Cancer 1976; 37: 2906-2911.
  2. [42]42. Kokkoris CP. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. How does cancer reach the pia-arachnoid? Cancer 1983; 51: 154-160.
  3. [55]55. Glantz MJ, Hall WA, Cole BF et al. Diagnosis, management, and sur- vival of patients with leptomeningeal cancer based on cerebrospinal fluid-flow status. Cancer 1995; 75: 2919-2931.
  4. [135]135. Chamberlain MC, Kormanik PA. Prognostic significance of 111indium-DTPA CSF flow studies in leptomeningeal metastases. Neurology 1996; 46: 1674-1677.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Le Rhun, E., Weller, M., Brandsma, D., Van den Bent, M., de Azambuja, E., Henriksson, R., Boulanger, T., Peters, S., Watts, C., Wick, W., Wesseling, P., Rudà, R., & Preusser, M.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Centre Oscar Lambret (FR)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna (AT)
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
28
Issue
11
Pages
iv84-iv99
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2734482945
Cited by
637
References
203
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 131 · 2023: 127 · 2022: 109 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
21.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
ESMO
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Brain Metastases and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Management of metastatic bone disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
leptomeningeal metastasis, solid tumors, diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, subarachnoid space
MeSH terms
Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Medical Oncology, Meningeal Neoplasms, Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review