The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Higher Biologically Effective Dose of Radiotherapy Is Associated With Improved Outcomes for Locally Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Treated With Chemoradiation: An Analysis of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
Open accessAbstract
Background/purpose Patients treated with chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma (LA-NSCLC) were analyzed for local-regional failure (LRF) and overall survival (OS) with respect to radiotherapy dose intensity (BED). Materials/Methods This study combined data from seven Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials in which chemoradiotherapy was used for LA NSCLC: RTOG 88-08 (chemoradiation arm only), 90-15, 91-06, 92-04, 93-09 (nonoperative arm only), 94-10 and 98-01. The radiotherapeutic biologically effective dose (BED) received by each individual patient was calculated, as was the overall treatment time-adjusted BED (tBED) using standard formulae. Heterogeneity testing was done with Chi-squared statistics and weighted pooled hazard ratio estimates were used. Cox and Fine and Gray's proportional hazard models were used for OS and LRF, respectively, to test the associations between BED/tBED adjusted for other covariates. Results A total of 1,356 patients were analyzed for BED (1,348 for tBED). The 2-year and 5-year OS rates were 38% and 15%. The 2-year and 5-year LRF rates were 46% and 52%. BED (and tBED) were highly significantly associated with both OS and LRF, with or without adjustment for other covariates on multivariate analysis (p<0.0001). A 1 Gy BED increase in radiotherapy dose intensity was statistically significantly associated with approximately 4% relative improvement in survival – this is another way of expressing the finding that the pool adjusted HR for survival as a function of BED was 0.96. Similarly, a 1 Gy tBED increase in radiotherapy dose intensity was statistically significantly associated with approximately 3% relative improvement in local-regional control – this is another way of expressing the finding that the pool adjusted HR as a function of tBED was 0.97. Conclusions Higher radiotherapy dose intensity is associated with improved local-regional control and survival in the setting of chemoradiotherapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_25 · Cited by 45,181
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_37 · Cited by 26,297
A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk
Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144 · Cited by 14,290
A Class of $K$-Sample Tests for Comparing the Cumulative Incidence of a Competing Risk
Gray, R. J. (1988) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176350951 · Cited by 4,960
Modelling for Survival Data in Medical Research
(1995) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1995.10485920 · Cited by 2,145
Furuse, K., Fukuoka, M., Kawahara, M., Nishikawa, H., Takada, Y., Kudoh, S., Katagami, N., & Ariyoshi, Y. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1999.17.9.2692 · Cited by 1,495
Albain, K. S., Swann, R. S., Rusch, V. W., Turrisi, A. T., Shepherd, F. A., Smith, C., Chen, Y., Livingston, R. B., Feins, R. H., Gandara, D. R., et al. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60737-6 · Cited by 1,470
Self-citationModelling Survival Data in Medical Research.
McLachlan, G. J., & Collett, D. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533471 · Cited by 1,021
Metadata
- Authors
- Machtay, M., Bae, K., Movsas, B., Paulus, R., Gore, E. M., Komaki, R., Albain, K., Sause, W. T., & Curran, W. J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 425-434
- ISSN
- 0360-3016 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984068275
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 11.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Higher Biologically Effective Dose of Radiotherapy Is Associated With Improved Outcomes for Locally Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Treated With Chemoradiation: An Analysis of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.004
- The paper
- Machtay, M., Bae, K., Movsas, B., Paulus, R., Gore, E. M., Komaki, R., Albain, K., Sause, W. T., & Curran, W. J. (2012). Higher Biologically Effective Dose of Radiotherapy Is Associated With Improved Outcomes for Locally Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Treated With Chemoradiation: An Analysis of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.