Cited by 88Advanced Radiotherapy TechniquesMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Markerless Pancreatic Tumor Target Localization Enabled By Deep Learning

Open access
Zhao, Wei, Shen, Liyue, Han, Bin, Yang, Yong, Cheng, Kai, Toesca, Diego A.S., Koong, Albert C., Chang, Daniel T. +1 more·2019·International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics

Abstract

Purpose Deep learning is an emerging technique that allows us to capture imaging information beyond the visually recognizable level of a human being. Because of the anatomic characteristics and location, on-board target verification for radiation delivery to pancreatic tumors is a challenging task. Our goal was to use a deep neural network to localize the pancreatic tumor target on kV x-ray images acquired using an on-board imager for image guided radiation therapy.Methods and materials The network is set up in such a way that the input is either a digitally reconstructed radiograph image or a monoscopic x-ray projection image acquired by the on-board imager from a given direction, and the output is the location of the planning target volume in the projection image. To produce a sufficient number of training x-ray images reflecting the vast number of possible clinical scenarios of anatomy distribution, a series of changes were introduced to the planning computed tomography images, including deformation, rotation, and translation, to simulate inter- and intrafractional variations. After model training, the accuracy of the model was evaluated by retrospectively studying patients who underwent pancreatic cancer radiation therapy. Statistical analysis using mean absolute differences (MADs) and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient were used to assess the accuracy of the predicted target positions.Results MADs between the model-predicted and the actual positions were found to be less than 2.60 mm in anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique directions for both axes in the detector plane. For comparison studies with and without fiducials, MADs are less than 2.49 mm. For all cases, Lin's concordance correlation coefficients between the predicted and actual positions were found to be better than 93%, demonstrating the success of the proposed deep learning for image guided radiation therapy.Conclusions We demonstrated that markerless pancreatic tumor target localization is achievable with high accuracy by using a deep learning technique approach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.05.071

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zhao et al. introduced a deep learning-based approach to localize pancreatic tumor in projection X-ray images for image-guided radiation therapy without the need for fiducials.

    “Zhao et al. [269] introduced a new deep learning-based approach to localize pancreatic tumor in projection X-ray images for image-guided radiation therapy without the need for fiducials.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, W., Shen, L., Han, B., Yang, Y., Cheng, K., Toesca, D. A. S., Koong, A. C., Chang, D. T., & Xing, L.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Xing, Lei
Venue
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
105
Issue
2
Pages
432-439
ISSN
0360-3016 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2951743624
Cited by
88
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4
FWCI
9.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1R01 CA176553, R01CA227713)
  • Google
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
pancreatic cancer, image-guided radiotherapy, deep neural network, planning target volume, digitally reconstructed radiographs, fiducial markers
MeSH terms
Organ Motion, Deep Learning, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Pancreas, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Radiography, Neural Networks, Computer, Fiducial Markers, Radiotherapy, Image-Guided, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review