Cited by 116Fatigue and fracture mechanicsMechanical Behavior of CompositesNumerical methods in engineering

A cohesive zone model for fatigue crack growth allowing for crack retardation

Open access
Ural, Ani, Krishnan, Venkat R., Papoulia, Katerina D.·2009·International Journal of Solids and Structures

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.01.031

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Ural et al. (2009), a cohesive zone model for fatigue crack growth is developed that also considers crack retardation during unloading regimes.

    “In Ural et al. (2009) , a cohesive zone model for fatigue crack growth is developed, which also considers crack retardation during unloading regimes.”

    From A cohesive-zone crack healing model for self-healing materials (2018) · cites this paper as Ural et al. (2009)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ural, A., Krishnan, V. R., & Papoulia, K. D.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Papoulia, Katerina D.
Venue
International Journal of Solids and Structures
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
46
Issue
11-12
Pages
2453-2462
ISSN
0020-7683 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079809016
Cited by
115
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2009-09-01)
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Solids and Structures (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Fatigue and fracture mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Mechanical Behavior of Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Numerical methods in engineering
Keywords
cohesive zone model, fatigue crack growth, crack growth retardation, damage evolution, traction-separation relation, stress threshold, aluminum alloys, 316L stainless steel, overload effects, stress ratio, ductile fracture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review