A continuum damage mechanics framework for modeling micro-damage healing
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Alsheghri and Al-Rub (2015), a thermodynamics-based cohesive zone methodology is used to model crack healing behavior by extending previous work on continuum damage-healing mechanics.
“In Alsheghri and Al-Rub (2015) a thermodynamics-based cohesive zone methodology is used to model crack healing behavior by extending previous work on continuum damage-healing mechanics ( Darabi et al., 2012 ).”
From A cohesive-zone crack healing model for self-healing materials (2018) · cites this paper as Darabi et al., 2012
Similar healing evolution laws have been used in continuum damage-healing mechanics frameworks and in some existing cohesive-healing formulations.
“Similar healing evolution laws have been used in the context of continuum damage-healing mechanics frameworks (e.g., seeDarabi et al., 2012) and for some existing cohesive-healing formulations (e.g., seeAlsheghri and Al-Rub, 2015, 2016).”
From A thermodynamically consistent mixed-mode cohesive zone model for fracture of self-healing materials (2026) · cites this paper as Darabi et al., 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 76 · Cited by 222
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Bhasin, A., Bommavaram, R., Greenfield, M.L., Little, D.N., 2011. Use of molecular dynamics to investigate self-healing mechanisms in asphalt binders. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering (ASCE) 23, 485-492.
- Cordebois, J., Sidoroff, F., 1982. Anisotropic damage in elasticity and plasticity. Journal De Mecanique Theorique Et Appliquee, 45-60.
- Krajcinovic, D., 1996. Damage Mechanics. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
- Authors
- Darabi, M. K., Abu Al-Rub, R. K., & Little, D. N.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Venue
- International Journal of Solids and Structures
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 492-513
- ISSN
- 0020-7683 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140230566
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Solids and Structures (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg
- Federal Highway Administration
- Qatar National Research Fund
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Numerical methods in engineering
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Mechanical Behavior of Composites
- Keywords
- self-healing materials, continuum damage mechanics, tangent stiffness, thermodynamic framework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
