Finite element analysis of the damage and healing behavior of self-healing ceramic materials
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sigmoidal strength recovery curves were obtained from experiments on self-healing ceramic materials, asphalt concrete, microcapsule-based self-healing materials, and hydrogels.
“For example, sigmoidal strength recovery curves were obtained from experiments conducted on self-healing ceramic materials (Ozaki et al., 2016(Ozaki et al., , 2020)), asphalt concrete (García, 2012;Qiu et al., 2012), microcapsule-based self-healing materials (Zwaag, 2008), and hydrogels (Wang et al., 2017;Yu et al., 2018).”
From A thermodynamically consistent mixed-mode cohesive zone model for fracture of self-healing materials (2026) · cites this paper as Ozaki et al., 2016
Section 3.2 compares healing-time-dependent strength recovery in self-healing ceramics with experimental results reported by Osada et al. (2009). Our copy does not describe those experimental curves as sigmoidal, so it supports the experimental strength-recovery portion of the claim but not the specified curve shape. The other materials are attributed to other citations in the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.81)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe sigmoid-like evolution of recovery ratios is consistent with experimental observations obtained for various self-healing materials.
“which is consistent with experimental observations obtained for various self-healing materials.”
From A thermodynamically consistent mixed-mode cohesive zone model for fracture of self-healing materials (2026) · cites this paper as Ozaki et al., 2016
Section 3.2 (page unavailable) reports a qualitative agreement between modeled strength recovery over healing time and experimental results for alumina/SiC nanocomposites. It does not describe the observed recovery as sigmoid-like or establish that pattern across various self-healing materials. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Kamoda, K. , Osada, T. , Mitome, M. , Hara, T. , Takahashi, K. , 2014. Nano/Micro-Structure analysis of self crack healing ceramics. In: Proc. Mech. Eng. Congress, Japan in Japanese .
- Kurumatani, M. , Terada, K. , Kato, J. , Kyoya, T. , Kashiyama, K. , 2015. Crack propaga- tion analysis using an isotropic damage model based on fracture mechanics for concrete. In: Proceedings of 7th Korea-Japan Workshop on Computational Me- chanics, pp. 10-11 .
- Voyiadjis, G.Z. , Shojaei, A. , Li, G. , Kattan, P.I. , 2011b. A theory of anisotropic healing and damage mechanics of materials. Proc. R. Soc. A 468, 163-183 .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A cohesive-zone crack healing model for self-healing materials
Ponnusami, S. A., Krishnasamy, J., Turteltaub, S., & van der Zwaag, S. (2018) · International Journal of Solids and Structures · doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.11.004 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
A thermodynamically consistent mixed-mode cohesive zone model for fracture of self-healing materials
Giraldo-Londoño, O., Spring, D. W., Muñetón-López, R. A., & Paulino, G. H. (2026) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7528848
- Authors
- Ozaki, S., Osada, T., & Nakao, W.
- Affiliations
- Yokohama National University (JP)
- National Institute for Materials Science (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Ozaki, Shingo
- Venue
- International Journal of Solids and Structures
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 100-101
- Pages
- 307-318
- ISSN
- 0020-7683 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2508674786
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (vor, 730 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- International Journal of Solids and Structures (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Advanced Low Carbon Technology Research and Development Program
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Ceramics and Composites › Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Numerical methods in engineering
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
- Keywords
- self-healing ceramics, crack healing, damage constitutive model, brittle ceramics, oxidation kinetics, oxygen partial pressure, fracture mechanics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
