Are head bandages required post-pinnaplasty?
Open accessAbstract
A best evidence topic in ear, nose and throat surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: In patients who are undergoing pinnaplasty for prominent ears, does the use of post-operative head bandages as compared to not using post-operative head bandages improve clinical outcomes? A total of 121 papers were identified using the reported search protocol, of which five articles represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. All five studies showed that no advantage exists in using head bandages with patients who have undergone pinnaplasty. Four of the five studies concluded that head bandages should not be utilised at all, whereas two of the five studies suggested that there is little reason to use head bandages after the first 24 h post-pinnaplasty. Therefore, the clinical bottom line is that provided the pinnaplasty result is good at time of surgery, there is reasonable evidence to suggest that head bandages have no effect on complications or patient satisfaction, so at best they are unnecessary and at worst, their physical drawbacks may actually outweigh any of their perceived benefits.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prolonged headband use beyond 24 hours may not provide additional benefits and could increase complications.
“However, prolonged headband use beyond 24 hours may not provide additional benefits and could increase complications.102,103”
From Otoplasty Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes: A Practical Review (2026) · cites this paper as [103]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Morbidity of otoplasty: a review of 562 consecutive cases
Calder, J. C., & Naasan, A. (1994) · British Journal of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1016/0007-1226(94)90049-3 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Towards evidence-based medicine in surgical practice: Best BETs
Khan, O. A., Dunning, J., Parvaiz, A. C., et al. (2011) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.08.001 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Ramkumar, S., Narayanan, V., & Laing, H. (2006) · Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2006.01.011 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
How long should ears be bandaged after otoplasty?
Bartley, J. R. F. (1998) · The Journal of Laryngology & Otology · doi:10.1017/s0022215100141015 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Head dressings for pinnaplasty: a tradition not supported by evidence
Wong, M. C., & Sylaidis, P. (2001) · British Journal of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1054/bjps.2000.3468 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Ear dressings post pinnaplasty
Self, A., Madani, H., Senior, N., et al. (2009) · Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2009.11.051 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Orabi, A. A., Chintamani, B. H., & Timms, M. S. (2009) · PubMed · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Self AC, Madani H, Senior N, Howes S, Dheansa BS. Ear dressings post pinna- plasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010 Jun;63(6):e555.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Otoplasty Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes: A Practical Review
Kaleeny, J. D., & Janis, J. E. (2026) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000007404
- Authors
- Norris, J. M., Mabvuure, N. T., Cumberworth, A., & Watts, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB)
- Royal Sussex County Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Norris, Joseph M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Surgery
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 330-333
- ISSN
- 1743-9159 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9191
- OpenAlex
- W1985240544
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
- Keywords
- prominent ears, postoperative care, otoplasty, postoperative complications, patient satisfaction, ear surgery
- MeSH terms
- Bandages, Child, Ear, Humans, Otologic Surgical Procedures, Plastic Surgery Procedures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review