Cited by 6Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies

Are head bandages required post-pinnaplasty?

Open access
Norris, Joseph M., Mabvuure, Nigel T., Cumberworth, Alex, Watts, Simon J.·2012·International Journal of Surgery

Abstract

A best evidence topic in ear, nose and throat surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: In patients who are undergoing pinnaplasty for prominent ears, does the use of post-operative head bandages as compared to not using post-operative head bandages improve clinical outcomes? A total of 121 papers were identified using the reported search protocol, of which five articles represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. All five studies showed that no advantage exists in using head bandages with patients who have undergone pinnaplasty. Four of the five studies concluded that head bandages should not be utilised at all, whereas two of the five studies suggested that there is little reason to use head bandages after the first 24 h post-pinnaplasty. Therefore, the clinical bottom line is that provided the pinnaplasty result is good at time of surgery, there is reasonable evidence to suggest that head bandages have no effect on complications or patient satisfaction, so at best they are unnecessary and at worst, their physical drawbacks may actually outweigh any of their perceived benefits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.05.006

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prolonged headband use beyond 24 hours may not provide additional benefits and could increase complications.

    “However, prolonged headband use beyond 24 hours may not provide additional benefits and could increase complications.102,103”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Self AC, Madani H, Senior N, Howes S, Dheansa BS. Ear dressings post pinna- plasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010 Jun;63(6):e555.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norris, J. M., Mabvuure, N. T., Cumberworth, A., & Watts, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB)
  • Royal Sussex County Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Norris, Joseph M.
Venue
International Journal of Surgery
Published
2012
Volume
10
Issue
7
Pages
330-333
ISSN
  • 1743-9159 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9191
OpenAlex
W1985240544
Cited by
6
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Keywords
prominent ears, postoperative care, otoplasty, postoperative complications, patient satisfaction, ear surgery
MeSH terms
Bandages, Child, Ear, Humans, Otologic Surgical Procedures, Plastic Surgery Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review