The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technology acceptance model for internet banking: an invariance analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology
Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y. K., Sheng, O. R. L., & Tam, K. Y. (1999) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1999.11518247 · Cited by 1,951
Cited by
Lee, M.-C. (2009) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2008.11.006 · Cited by 2,037
The effects of perceived risk and technology type on users’ acceptance of technologies
Im, I., Kim, Y., & Han, H.-J. (2008) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2007.03.005 · Cited by 538
Technology Acceptance among Physicians: A New Take on TAM
Yarbrough, A. K., & Smith, T. B. (2007) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558707305942 · Cited by 482
Consumer acceptance of internet banking: The influence of internet trust
Grabner‐Kräuter, S., & Faullant, R. (2008) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/02652320810913855 · Cited by 316
Gamal Aboelmaged, M. (2010) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/02635571011030042 · Cited by 240
Metadata
- Authors
- Lai, V. S., & Li, H.
- Venue
- Information & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 373-386
- ISSN
- 0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165202340
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technology acceptance model for internet banking: an invariance analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.im.2004.01.007
- The paper
- Lai, V. S., & Li, H. (2005). Technology acceptance model for internet banking: an invariance analysis. Information & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.01.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
