Cited by 2,037Technology Adoption and User BehaviourCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: An integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit

Lee, Ming-Chi·2009·Electronic Commerce Research and Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.elerap.2008.11.006

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, M.-C.
Affiliations
National Pingtung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Lee, Ming-Chi
Venue
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
130-141
ISSN
1567-4223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150482479
Cited by
2,037
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 134 · 2024: 151 · 2023: 185 · 2022: 210 · 2021: 199 · 2020: 144 · 2019: 144 · 2018: 136 · 2017: 109 · 2016: 97 · 2015: 134 · 2014: 98 · 2013: 86 · 2012: 60
FWCI
56.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
internet banking, online banking adoption, technology acceptance model, theory of planned behavior, risk perception, perceived benefits, financial risk, perceived usefulness, user intention, e-commerce adoption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review