Cited by 124Image and Video Quality AssessmentImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesAdvanced Data Compression Techniques

Objective quality assessment of color images based on a generic perceptual reduced reference

Open access
Carnec, Mathieu, Le Callet, Patrick, Barba, Dominique·2008·Signal Processing: Image Communication

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.image.2008.02.003

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carnec, M., Le Callet, P., & Barba, D.
Affiliations
Université de Nantes (FR)
Corresponding author
Carnec, Mathieu
Venue
Signal Processing: Image Communication
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
239-256
ISSN
0923-5965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124036825
Cited by
124
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 17
FWCI
17.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Signal Processing Image Communication (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Data Compression Techniques
Keywords
objective image quality assessment, color images, human visual system model, similarity measures, subjective quality correlation, lossy image compression, image transmission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review